Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by SiriusDawg, Dec 7, 2012.
odd thing, those deductions....and offsets....and credits....and gross revenue....and taxable income....etc.....etc.....etc.....
do you honestly thing the government has a "not enough money to spend" problem primarily?
from your link.
"Some of those affluent households would pay higher taxes next year under other parts of the president’s tax plan and increases imposed by the Affordable Care Act, but not under the centerpiece, the part most frequently promoted by the president and most bitterly opposed by Congressional Republicans"
Sounds like you don't understand the plan. Nice fail.
Holy shit, did you see what part that was in Obama's plan?
What part of "most" are you unable to understand?
So taxes will go up under obama's or not? You don't understand your own post. Not to shocking.
Which taxes? For who?
Yeah, my understanding is that if you earn over $250,000 k/year, you'll be taxed the higher rate only on the income above $250k.
What's the problem?
Are they lying and saying that if you earn over $250k, ALL of your income will be taxed at the higher rate?
They have plenty of money, they just spend too much on corporate welfare programs, like a defense budget that equals the next twenty nations COMBINED.
We dont need 3 ways to nuke Russia,
we dont need 53,000 troops in Germany to defend against the Soviets,
We dont need 36,000 troops in Japan to prevent them from attacking Asia again
We dont need 15,000 troops in Kuwait to prevent Sadaam from invading
We dont need 68,000 troops in Afghanistan to prevent Al Qaeda from attacking us again.
Al Qaeda in Afghanistan was destroyed 6 weeks after 9/11. The last army to conquer that country was Alexander the Greats
We are now fighting Pashtun nationalist who only want us to leave.
$2,000,000,000,000 for two wars down the drain, and no one says a peep.
They want to blame old people (effectively for not dying quick enough), poor people who spend all their money IN THIS COUNTRY.
Both parties are perfectly fine with corporate welfare, one party wants to make some cuts to personal welfare and the other wants to shred it to confetti.
39% vs 37% is not an argument, its an agreement.
Asymmetric warfare will dominate this century. F22's and Abrams tanks are effectively useless, unless youre a defen$e contractor with a phat contract.
agreed with everything but the last bit, as i've seen M1A1's in action and they scare me
Notice how Rachel called out both ABC and The New York Times on that?
Huh? Did ya?
i'm sorry; i really can't stand rachel maddow, and until i see the headline "Rachel Maddow Finds Jesus!" that situation probably won't change
Hence why so many look, point, and laugh at you
It seems to be the Republican way....don't like what they say? Ignore them and pretend everything you say is correct.
No wonder most Republicans are seen as a worldwide joke from just about every way imaginable.
This may be the most retarded thread ever.
Republicans are stupid because they believe Obama when he says he is going to raise taxes on people making over 250k?
why would i care about what rachel maddow has said? is she brilliant? is she a world leader? is she influential?
or does she host the Kool-Aid hour on MSNBC?
we're also stupid for believing obama when he said he wanted to "fundamentally change America"; "change the language"; "change the history"
"change the history"???
Really? That is what you took away from the article?
I think a 2nd grade student would take away from the article a better understand of what it explains to the readers.
I'm looking at your thread title and what you quoted. I'm not sure you should be insulting the reading comprehension of others.
Well, you are the idiot who can't read the article so I will take your suggestions with a grain of salt.