Yup, you jumped in among a racist feeding frenzy and i'm the bad guy for noticing? Your only point is a law that might not even apply, depending on a judges instruction, but you think I'm clueless? Man is your head gonna explode if this don't play out EXACTLY as you demand.
And watch the salty language fella!
I don't know how the law wouldn't apply, pretty cut and dry, kind of like when a red octagon sign says "stop" the law is pretty cut and dry. I digress. If I was racist I would say let the mexican guy fry.
I am a gun advocate. I live in the suburbs of Chicago which has some of the strictest gun laws yet small sections of the city has so much illegal gun activity it makes Chicago look like the wild west. We are in the tops for shootings and murders. Sad as most of Chicago is beautiful and low crime.
I helped get the laws changed in my suburb just recently allowing handguns for the first time in decades. Crime is extremely low in my town even though this law changed.
So my saying "in my opinion" zimmie was justified by law in shooting a kid who was pounding his face and head into the ground isn't being racist. It's being pro 2nd amendment. If zimmie had jumped the kid and pounded the kid's face the kid would be justified, as long as his gun was legal, in standing his ground "in my opinion".
There are members in my sportsmen club that are black and agree with me about zimmie and trayvon. No matter how much the media wanted to paint this as a rich white guy stalking and shooting an innocent little boy eating skittles, to a "white hispanic" who was punched by trayvon to a mexican who was jumped and pummeled by trayvon. They all agree he was justified.
Not everything is black vs white as you're trying to make it. Not even black vs mexican. Keep trying for that racial divide though.