Politics A good piece on scalia

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Beth143nacho, Feb 15, 2016.

  1. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,306
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,810
    Likes Received:
    16,486
    MilkyDischarge and scoobyla like this.
  2. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,306
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,810
    Likes Received:
    16,486
    No. 1: No nominee for the high court can get through the Senate before the election. No one.

    No. 2: President Obama and the Democratic candidates for president know that. So do Republicans. All God’s children know it.

    No. 3: Since the nominee will not be approved, Obama will use the opportunity to advance other goals. He will propose someone who burnishes his own progressive credentials and shows why control of the court depends on the November election. Putting Senate Republicans in an awkward position would be a nice bonus. But the target is November.

    No. 4: Obama will nominate someone whose demographic characteristics help in the contests for president and U.S. Senate. That is not just his main criterion. It is his only one. The candidate could be from a purple state. Or a Latino. Or openly gay. Having finished law school would be a plus.

    No. 5: The proposed candidate will not receive a Senate vote before the election or in the lame-duck session. If Mitch McConnell even considered it, he would become the former majority leader.

    No. 6: Democrats and Republicans will both use the issue to show voters why it is crucial to elect them -- and not the other party. Democrats will add that this again shows we have a "do nothing" Congress. Republicans will say it shows we have “do too much” judges.

    No. 7: All the rest is political theater, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
     
    Penelope, Stew Nod and Chatsworth like this.
  3. Snotty

    Snotty My Snothand be strong!!! VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    83,147
    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Messages:
    25,226
    Likes Received:
    17,688
    No. 6 and 7....................And I don't care anymore........You'll understand later.............
     
  4. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,306
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,810
    Likes Received:
    16,486
    Yep
     
  5. smellynugget

    smellynugget Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    3,931
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    724
    The only good piece on Scalia is soon to be eaten by worms...
     
  6. hoochieking

    hoochieking Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    62,661
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,773
    Likes Received:
    2,715
    You are so fucking stupid.
     
  7. bootyclause

    bootyclause Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    11,316
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,329
    Likes Received:
    3,074
    that's not well written. It's just snarky whining.
     
  8. bootyclause

    bootyclause Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    11,316
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,329
    Likes Received:
    3,074
    here's an actual well written article about this, just pure facts. From a liberal source but contains little to no opinion, just news.

    http://www.npr.org/2016/02/14/46672...residential-appointments-to-the-supreme-court


    Basically the longest approval time in history has been 125 days and there's 300 plus left in Obama's presidency. America will not side with the Republicans if they truly block this for a year, it will undermine any last chance for a moderate like Rubio to win a general election.
     
  9. cg256

    cg256 Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    69,049
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,581
    Likes Received:
    8,821
    If you bothered to read past point 1, you would see that the longest vacancy was 27 months, or 391 days after the court went to 9 justices. 125 days was the longest it took for a single nominee to be approved, not the longest time the court went without a full bar. We would have to go till March 12, 2017 for any kind of record to be broken.
     
  10. lilbuddy67

    lilbuddy67 A man with breath-taking anger management issues Banned User

    Reputations:
    86,104
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    13,277
    Likes Received:
    15,743
    Biased piece of shit fantasy writing. I should neg you.
     
  11. MilkyDischarge

    MilkyDischarge Se suelto el diablo Gold

    Reputations:
    69,227
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Messages:
    8,046
    Likes Received:
    13,603