Britain issues new guidelines on prosecuting offensive online comments

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by HS Cult Leader, Dec 20, 2012.

  1. HS Cult Leader

    HS Cult Leader Elite Member Gold

    Reputations:
    101,075
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Messages:
    13,065
    Likes Received:
    18,315
    Britain issues new guidelines on prosecuting offensive online comments

    By Henry Chu

    December 19, 2012, 11:42 a.m.




    [TABLE]
    [TR]
    [TD] [​IMG]

    Keir Starmer, chief prosecutor for England and Wales. (Lewis Whyld / Agence France-Presse / Getty Images)

    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]



    LONDON – People who post offensive messages on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter should face criminal charges only if their comments are harassing or threatening and not simply in bad taste, according to new legal guidelines in Britain that follow a spate of controversial prosecutions.
    Free-speech advocates here have been alarmed in recent months by a number of incidents in which users of social media have been arrested and jailed for posting messages that others deemed repugnant. A 2003 law authorizes such harsh punishment for “indecent, obscene or menacing” communications sent through a public electronic network.
    But the law predates the explosion of such new media as Twitter and Facebook, and some police officials say that having to investigate the increasing number of complaints about offensive online messages is distracting them from more serious work.
    Keir Starmer, the chief prosecutor for England and Wales, said Wednesday that new guidelines from his office would raise the bar for criminal charges under the 2003 law by limiting most prosecutions to cases involving threatening and intimidating remarks targeted at specific individuals. That would help protect freedom of expression while still allowing authorities to crack down where warranted, he said.
    “There are millions of messages sent by social media every day, and if only a small percentage of those millions are deemed to be offensive, then there’s the potential for very many cases coming before our courts,” Starmer told BBC radio. “So we need a sensible way of dividing the messages into those which are more likely to be prosecuted – the threats and the harassment and the breach of court orders – and those that aren’t – the deeply unpopular, the shocking, the grossly offensive.”
    Under the new guidelines, most if not all of a recent rash of high-profile cases would probably not have been prosecuted, including a youth who was sent to jail for 12 weeks for posting crude jokes about two kidnapped girls and another young man who was sentenced to 240 hours of community service for declaring on Facebook that British soldiers “should die and go to hell.”
    Critics of the prosecutions noted that such comments might raise eyebrows and draw disapproving looks if spoken aloud in a pub, but online they suddenly become criminal offenses. Civil-liberties activists warned of a chilling effect on free speech.
    Starmer agreed, and consulted lawyers, police and other experts on setting a higher threshold for prosecution. The new guidelines go into effect immediately but will be reviewed again in March after the British public has had a chance to offer its input.
    “It would be stifling free speech if people thought that every time they communicated something which might be deeply offensive or deeply unpopular … then the police were likely to get involved,” Starmer said. “We need to protect the individual against threats and harassment … but free speech has its place.”
     
  2. NotMyBro

    NotMyBro VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    68,396
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,790
    Likes Received:
    4,975
    Fuck Britain. 3rd world shithole with no freedom of speech and no right to self-defense.
     
  3. newcastlefan

    newcastlefan גֵּרְשֹׁם VIP

    Reputations:
    135,768
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Messages:
    57,657
    Likes Received:
    16,956
    i thought the initial prosecution was kind of hypocritical of them. its ok to say those things on a TV talk show but not on Twitter?
     
  4. Hank Douglas

    Hank Douglas Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    1,766
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    518
    Fucking ridiculous. I'm glad I don't live in Britain but I'm sure it won't be long before something like that gets initiated over here. I can call someone a loud mouthed cunt to their face but over facebook I'll get arrested?

    Seriously so sick of the tyrants that run this world. If it were their way we would have to notify them every time we wanted to leave our houses, and tell theme exactly what we're going to be doing. Fucking fascists.
     
  5. Turtle Man

    Turtle Man Hello Darling Gold

    Reputations:
    131,697
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    9,382
    Likes Received:
    11,663
    nazis...they start everything ... the cameras..speed cameras etc..all here now
     
  6. HS Cult Leader

    HS Cult Leader Elite Member Gold

    Reputations:
    101,075
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Messages:
    13,065
    Likes Received:
    18,315
    That's why I posted it, mark my words, some politician in California will try this then on to N.Y. and on.. Ect...
     
  7. TelegramSam

    TelegramSam I love Sam's cock Banned User

    Reputations:
    619
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Messages:
    6,653
    Likes Received:
    54
    I have to say, I'm for free speech, but at this point I wish Howie was still on FM so that I could write the FCC letters and have him fined out of protest due to the show's terrible quality. If he was really fined millions for a handful of letters as he claimed, imagine how much he would have to shell out if this whole board wrote in.