News Cinemark asks theater shooting victims to pay $700,000 for legal fees

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by dawg, Jul 1, 2016.

  1. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    99,195
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    134,189
    Likes Received:
    117,602
    View attachment 80441

    Cinemark, the company that owns the Aurora cineplex where 12 people were murdered in 2012, is seeking nearly $700,000 from several victims of the attack who unsuccessfully sued the theater chain.

    Lawyers for Cinemark earlier this month filed a “bill of costs” for $699,187.13 in Arapahoe County District Court. Colorado court rules say that the winning side in a civil case is allowed to recover its litigation costs.

    The victims — more than two dozen survivors of the shooting and parents of those killed in it — sued Cinemark in state court beginning in 2012. They alleged that security lapses — such as a lack of armed guards on duty or gaps in security camera coverage — helped enable the attack, which also wounded 70 people. A jury last month sided with Cinemark and found that the company was not liable for the shooting.

    Last week, a judge overseeing a similar case in federal court filed by a different group of victims also decided in Cinemark’s favor. The judge’s order in that case says Cinemark is “awarded reasonable costs,” though Cinemark has yet to put an amount on the costs in the federal case.
    More than half of the victims involved in the federal case settled for undisclosed terms with Cinemark prior to the judge’s order. One said the possibility of having to pay the company’s legal fees was a factor in his decision to settle.

    Kevin Taylor, an attorney for Cinemark, declined to comment.

    Just because Cinemark has asked for the money doesn’t mean the victims will ultimately have to pay it. Judges must still approve the final totals in both cases.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Arapahoe County case have said they are considering an appeal of the verdict, the outcome of which could swing the cost debate. And, in other civil cases, it is not uncommon for the winning side to drop its cost demands in exchange for no appeal being filed.

    http://www.denverpost.com/2016/06/30/cinemark-aurora-theater-shooting-victims-legal-fees/
     
  2. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    One person with a .38 could have ended the drama.
     
  3. yosemite sam

    yosemite sam Camel Jockey

    Reputations:
    3
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2012
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    20,342
    They sued the theater and lost, damn. Im never going out to see a movie.
     
  4. Keyless Chuck

    Keyless Chuck Barely a VIP

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,253
    Likes Received:
    1,874
    Not against this, frivolous law suits litter our legal system.
     
  5. yosemite sam

    yosemite sam Camel Jockey

    Reputations:
    3
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2012
    Messages:
    27,340
    Likes Received:
    20,342
    Bad enough paying $12-15 for a ticket to sit in buttered seats with no legroom and $7.00 sodas. Now if I get shot in a theater Im fucked if I survive?
     
    GIRLY, OV and JPlaserman like this.
  6. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Bede bede beep VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,904
    Likes Received:
    23,896
    We should really blame the democrats and crooked lawyers that encouraged the families to sue. $600k in legal fees to defend one of the franchise events of our time is pretty cheap.
     
    Kilroy likes this.
  7. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    25 would have made a statement.
     
    GIRLY, JPlaserman and DaTenses like this.
  8. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    Theatres are obsolete.
     
    SuperFarts likes this.
  9. Nice

    Nice Active Member

    Reputations:
    124
    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    139
    In this case I doubt it. He had full SWAT protective armor, including helmet. One person with a .38 would just have made themself a target.

    Not that I'm saying responsible citizens with thorough training shouldn't be allowed to conceled carry in a theater (they should).
     
    GIRLY and JPlaserman like this.
  10. telecaster

    telecaster Get Yer Ya Ya's Out

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,859
    Likes Received:
    2,026
    They are? How did Finding Dory rake in over $320 million in a couple of weeks then?
     
    Leykis101 likes this.
  11. DaTenses

    DaTenses Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    7,892
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2015
    Messages:
    5,815
    Likes Received:
    9,420
    Not that vests protect you from head shots, which are part of any good defensive shooting technique, you're one of those idiots that can't tell a carrier from a ballistic vest. Your naming it "SWAT" just adds an extra layer of moron icing.
     
  12. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    If you duck and cover, the second biggest targets are the thighs, or in a pinch, ankles.
     
  13. JPlaserman

    JPlaserman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    451

    Wow Dawg, great post.
     
  14. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    Blacks.
     
  15. JPlaserman

    JPlaserman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    451

    That is simply not true.
    We love ❤ our big picture, our big bucket of refillable popcorn, our mega-Coca Cola.
    I'm a senior without a 3-D T.V. where can I see these movies otherwise?

    I love ❤ my show-house!!!*

    *That's movie theatre in your young'ins talk.
     
    Streetfighter likes this.
  16. onefourthree

    onefourthree Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    1,326
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,115
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    Is that what we want? Guys taking guns into movie theaters? Yeah, that's the answer!
     
    FlatTimmy likes this.
  17. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    Cool. 45 , minute finger fucking for the privilege of watching a shit movie with noisy teens.
     
  18. crazypreacher

    crazypreacher Not followin whitey's rules

    Reputations:
    29,043
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    50,857
    Likes Received:
    53,208
    Not sure if serious.
     
    hugh jasol likes this.
  19. Gwarn1

    Gwarn1 Single VIP

    Reputations:
    16,199
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    72,880
    Likes Received:
    21,871
    The patrons of the theater received the standard amount of security. To this day armed guards are not a standard of security for most movie theaters. Therefore the theater was not negligent and should not have been sued. Good for them fighting back
     
  20. JPlaserman

    JPlaserman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    451

    Very much so my friend, where were you at the first time you made that move?

    You know, putting your hand ✋ on her leg...

    Poking the hole in the bottom of the popcorn box…