Cracked.com...disabled comments on a fruit crying male rape

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by boognishstern, Feb 4, 2015.

  1. boognishstern

    boognishstern Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    27,749
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,480
    Cracked on Male Rape and Feminist Problems
    January 30, 2015 Observatorium Leave a comment
    [​IMG]

    So Cracked published a very harrowing account of a man who was raped after drinking far too much.

    The sad part is that his account is almost virtually identical to that of a woman. He dealt with disbelief, questions of why he didn’t just fight her off, and the destruction of his relationship. Which means that the negative effects of rape aren’t discriminatory (not that it was something we wanted equality in).

    But there was something interesting in the article: that the frequency of male rape is much higher than we may think.

    It was thought that 10% of men were rape victims and the perpetrators were mostly other men. However . . .

    “a 2012 survey of 40,000 households found that a staggering 38 percent of sexual-assault victims were male. Nearly half of those men reported that their attacker was a woman.”

    If you’re wondering why it took so long to find out that statistic well, it’s for the same reason it took us so long to find out that rape was common among women: people didn’t want to come forward. The extra stigma attached to men about wanting sex all the time and being the stronger gender means they were extra careful in confessing to being a victim.

    Now, whether you like me or not the fact is this is a blog that offers constructive criticism on the feminist movement and where it can make improvements.

    So where is the problem with this article?

    They disabled the comments.

    And why does that concern feminists? Because they’re the only ones that would get shitty about it.

    Yes there are naturally shitheads in every conversation about rape. Hell, in the end of the article the man said:

    “So for me — or anyone else — to decide that my story is proof that men are the “real” victims of the modern world and that women/feminists are thus the enemy, is nuts. All victims are real. All victims should feel like they’re able to speak up without being dismissed or ridiculed.”

    But here’s the thing: I’m a Cracked addict (heh). I KNOW my site.

    Cracked’s readers are educated, reasonably left leaning, and not opposed to reasoned debate. In articles discussing sensitive topics such as racism, sexism, political correctness, and rape they are generally supportive. They are also not opposed to calling out BS when they see it (like ripping apart Zoe Quinn and Lena Dunham respectively). And MRAs and other rather unsavory characters always find their way to these articles.

    Yet Cracked did not censor the comments on ANY of those.

    Now tell me right now, the people who do traditionally doubt female rape victims (MRAs, assholes, male supremacists) . . . do you think they’re going to rag on a male rape victim? Especially when these are the groups that push the agenda that males are equally victimized and should get attention?

    Simply put, no.

    Remember, one of my biggest issues with the modern feminism is that it relies on mob style popularity to remain relevant. While that produces enormous amounts of support quickly, the supporters aren’t all that faithful and as we saw in numerous cases (Duke Lacrosse, Lena Dunham, Hofstra, UVA) the supporters virtually disappear when confronted with any sort of adversity.

    While false rape is NOWHERE as common as actual rape, it’s no secret feminists try to downplay it as much as possible. It’s not because a reasonable discussion isn’t possible (hey false rapes are common enough that we should give the accused the benefit of the doubt without calling the victim a liar, done) but because the bandwagon feminists wouldn’t stand for such nuanced thought.

    Male rape is very much in the same basket. Feminists “accept” that it happens but try to downplay it as much as possible (though recently, there’s a glimmer of change) or initiate the Oppression Olympics to protect their herd of idiots.

    So when all the normal dip shits who comment on previous articles are accounted for . . . which is the group likely to raise a ruckus about a article promoting the idea (and marginalization) of rape of men?

    I’ll give you a hint, the author addressed it in the very next sentence:

    “If a movement — regardless of what it represents — ever feels like it’s losing ground by showing empathy, then something has gone seriously fucking awry.”

    Combine that with a sentence in which he expressed how a female friend of his played the “women have it worse card” when sympathizing with the plight of a male rape victim in a book and it’s pretty clear who he’s referring to.

    So congratulations feminists, you are the cause of censorship on a website which otherwise discussed sensitive topics such as genocide, rape and sexism with no trouble at all.

    At some point, you have to abandon the mob and instead stick to reason.
     
  2. Butcher

    Butcher ?

    Reputations:
    16,203
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    40,120
    Likes Received:
    3,382
    What's he saying, Robin??


    Robin?
     
  3. potroast

    potroast Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    53,987
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2011
    Messages:
    9,578
    Likes Received:
    9,930
    You MAD bro?

    :ujoker:
     
    PI Nate likes this.
  4. boognishstern

    boognishstern Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    27,749
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,480
    haha, the editor's response:
    David Wong
    Administrator

    Karma: 4404
    [​IMG] Offline

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Re: Article says comments are disabled, they're not.
    « Reply #12 on: January 30, 2015, 10:37 AM »
    Yep, they've been disabled here and we're going to pick and choose articles going forward where we're pretty sure the comment sections would do nothing but expose the interview subject to abuse.

    It was the "girl sold into sex slavery" comments that sealed it, so, so many people had to be banned for asking for pics of the girl, and talking about how she deserved it, etc, that we figured we needed to start making this an option. Before that, we had the Zoey Quinn column in which (until it was removed) the top voted comment was simply calling her a cunt.

    We're hosting these comments, and broadcasting them to the world. They become a part of the site's content. So going forward, we need to as a site be more responsible about keeping the poison out.
    [​IMG] Logged
    I am Cracked Executive Editor David Wong, I just wrote a book about giant parasites that take over your brain. Here I am on Facebook.

    http://www.cracked.com/forums/topic/194503/article-says-comments-are-disabled-theyre-not.

    http://www.cracked.com/forums/topic/194519/5-bizarre-realities-being-man-who-was-raped-by-woman
     
  5. Butcher

    Butcher ?

    Reputations:
    16,203
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    40,120
    Likes Received:
    3,382
    Black Wong
     
  6. MyLazyHand

    MyLazyHand Russia and France Know What to Do

    Reputations:
    162,029
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    15,280
    Likes Received:
    23,040
    Wong is wight about dis.
     
    John Mahlin likes this.
  7. boognishstern

    boognishstern Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    27,749
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,480
    yeah, i'd be a bit ansy about sex slavery talk on my site.
     
  8. zerokarma

    zerokarma Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    7,103
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    TLDR, was the woman a fat slob?
     
  9. boognishstern

    boognishstern Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    27,749
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,480
    sadly no photographic evidense.
     
  10. ScottBaiosPenis

    ScottBaiosPenis Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    76,918
    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    8,964
    Likes Received:
    15,447
    it appears that two wongs made a white
     
  11. ScottBaiosPenis

    ScottBaiosPenis Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    76,918
    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    8,964
    Likes Received:
    15,447
    Isn't it a humor site why would they bother posting this stuff
     
  12. todd packer

    todd packer Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,775
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2013
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    5,668
    boner = not guilty
     
  13. boognishstern

    boognishstern Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    27,749
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    4,480
    they've evolved