Discussion in 'The Bar' started by Shivvy, Jun 9, 2014.
ive been reading up on it and it seems that there were two other suspects
people kill people. don't blame the knives.
i heard there was no unknown knife-man on the grassy hill in Brentwood.
Of course he did it. A formerl NFL star overpowering a woman and a guy much smaller than him? Amazing!
There was so much blood evidence that tied OJ to the killings that any other jury outside of LA would have come back with a guilty verdict but the prosecutors didn't count on the stupidity of the jury and lost them on the technical evidence. Once Johnny Cochrane played the race card it was over.
i read that it couldve been drug dealers or OJs son
The cops looked into and investigated both of those theories and came up with nothing.
this "technical evidence" they lost on, would that happen to include things like "the proof"?
he cut them and loved doing it.
Yes. Next question.
It was more a case of the judge/prosecutors being incompetent than of OJ being "not guilty".
Her legs can't close like the four door hinge Bronco that O.J. killed the white whores with.
the glove di'int fit
they had to acquit
What the ever loving fuck are you saying?
O.J. ran them over with his Bronco.
OJ was a cowboy that did carpentry on the side?
dumb question - thumbs down