Discussion in 'The Bar' started by baltimore mike, Jan 20, 2013.
Generally without, but Dev looks good with them.
devs a skank
Doesn't matter as long as the boobs, butt, face and vag are ink free, and the tats are tasteful.
Some women can wear them well. Most, not so much to my taste.
Dev's a sex goddess that you would kill to bang.
my wife has 4
shes a hep c having whore
Wait, do you count the "Deposit Cum Here" and the arrow as one tattoo or two?
No ink. The female body is gods most beautiful creation, we wouldn't paint half dome in Yosemite would we (well the minorities would graffiti it to hell if they had the chance but you know what I mean)
i do like foot tatts
Without. However, since being served my walking papers in '06 and re-entering the dating scene,
I have found that "The Un-Tatted Woman" is a rarity and have come to accept it to some degree.
Women with what I call "The Chest Plate Tattoo" (generally depicting wings or some form of aviation
badge spanning shoulder to shoulder) are a complete turn off. No offense, it's just not my thing. I kind
of wish they ("they" being the collective community of women) would move on to something else to
proclaim their individuality, like a nice hat or figure flattering pantaloons or something.
Oh, and please die Baltimore Neckfat. Lol Bugsy.
This is the rule of thumb I am now embracing in this brave, new world.
Some women wear tats well. They rarely age well though.
schmoopy likes his women like he likes his coffee.
schmoopy doesn't like coffee.