Does this make you feel any better?

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Buster Himan, Oct 16, 2014.

  1. Buster Himan

    Buster Himan Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    13,446
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2014
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    3,232
  2. Mugsy

    Mugsy Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    13,971
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    3,503
    There's so much bullshit out there right now, I have no idea what to believe...
     
  3. Rockside7

    Rockside7 VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    156,462
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    7,783
    Likes Received:
    18,305
    Yes, thank you..

    This makes me feel much better.

    This 4:00 of Fox really helps because the other 23:56 really freaks me out

    Thanks Shep.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2014
    Droog likes this.
  4. Head Censor

    Head Censor Turgid Member VIP

    Reputations:
    394,286
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,395
    Likes Received:
    27,075
    Sounds like Shep might have suddenly found himself stuck with a portfolio that is overexposed relative to the stock market and lacking sufficient diversification in other areas. :dontknow:
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2014
    AllAboutHim Ed likes this.
  5. HORSETOOTHED

    HORSETOOTHED Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    6,155
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,464
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    Fuck no... "I promise" "Don't listen, don't read the words written online" This is how every disaster movie starts.
     
  6. John Sterling

    John Sterling Well-Known Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    49,042
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,159
    Likes Received:
    6,099
  7. John Sterling

    John Sterling Well-Known Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    49,042
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,159
    Likes Received:
    6,099
    [​IMG]
     
    babybear likes this.
  8. killallposers

    killallposers VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    152,791
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    13,435
    Likes Received:
    21,453
    He promised it would take just 3 mins, but he took 4. He lied and I can't believe anything he says now.
     
  9. JB50

    JB50 Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    1,951
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    416
    Wow Shep looks like hes had a lot of work done.
     
  10. somedude61

    somedude61 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    5,258
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    1,211
    Actually it isn't the disease that is pissing off. It is the lack of any serious leadership with regards to handling this situation. The CDC says that it isn't easy to catch. But then nurses who were suited up and took care of someone with Ebola got Ebola. How the fuck did that happen? How contagious is Ebola? How may times can I put Ebola into a paragraph? Where is the medical leadership in this country?
     
    AmishGirl and AllAboutHim Ed like this.
  11. Dick Nipaolo

    Dick Nipaolo Inconsequential human

    Reputations:
    6,068
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2014
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    845
    Damn long flu shot commercial...
     
    Turtle Man likes this.
  12. joe361

    joe361 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,057
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    4,678
    Likes Received:
    4,296
    This is how smart Americans and the media are. 40% of adults get flu shots even though anywhere from 3,000 to 49.000 die each year from the flu.
     
  13. yaddc

    yaddc Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    104,058
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    23,211
    Likes Received:
    20,764
    Remember its all of what you see, half of what you hear.
     
  14. HS Cult Leader

    HS Cult Leader Elite Member Gold

    Reputations:
    102,038
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Messages:
    13,114
    Likes Received:
    18,413
    Six Reasons to Panic

    Jonathan V. Last
    October 27, 2014, Vol. 20, No. 07

    As a rule, one should not panic at whatever crisis has momentarily fixed the attention of cable news producers. But the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, which has migrated to both Europe and America, may be the exception that proves the rule. There are at least six reasons that a controlled, informed panic might be in order.

    (1) Start with what we know, and don’t know, about the virus. Officials from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and other government agencies claim that contracting Ebola is relatively difficult because the virus is only transmittable by direct contact with bodily fluids from an infected person who has become symptomatic. Which means that, in theory, you can’t get Ebola by riding in the elevator with someone who is carrying the virus, because Ebola is not airborne.

    This sounds reassuring. Except that it might not be true. There are four strains of the Ebola virus that have caused outbreaks in human populations. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, the current outbreak (known as Guinean EBOV, because it originated in Meliandou, Guinea, in late November 2013) is a separate clade “in a sister relationship with other known EBOV strains.” Meaning that this Ebola is related to, but genetically distinct from, previous known strains, and thus may have distinct mechanisms of transmission.

    Not everyone is convinced that this Ebola isn’t airborne. Last month, the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy published an article arguing that the current Ebola has “unclear modes of transmission” and that “there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.”

    And even if this Ebola isn’t airborne right now, it might become so in the future. Viruses mutate and evolve in the wild, and the population of infected Ebola carriers is now bigger than it has been at any point in history—meaning that the pool for potential mutations is larger than it has ever been. As Dr. Philip K. Russell, a virologist who oversaw Ebola research while heading the U.S. Army’s Medical Research and Development Command, explained to the Los Angeles Times last week,

    I see the reasons to dampen down public fears. But scientifically, we’re in the middle of the first experiment of multiple, serial passages of Ebola virus in man. .  .  . God knows what this virus is going to look like. I don’t.

    In August, Science magazine published a survey conducted by 58 medical professionals working in African epidemiology. They traced the origin and spread of the virus with remarkable precision—for instance, they discovered that it crossed the border from Guinea into Sierra Leone at the funeral of a “traditional healer” who had treated Ebola victims. In just the first six months of tracking the virus, the team identified more than 100 mutated forms of it.

    Yet what’s really scary is how robust the already-established transmission mechanisms are. Have you ever wondered why Ebola protocols call for washing down infected surfaces with chlorine? Because the virus can survive for up to three weeks on a dry surface.

    How robust is transmission? Look at the health care workers who have contracted it. When Nina Pham, the Dallas nurse who was part of the team caring for Liberian national Thomas Duncan, contracted Ebola, the CDC quickly blamed her for “breaching protocol.” But to the extent that we have effective protocols for shielding people from Ebola, they’re so complex that even trained professionals, who are keenly aware that their lives are on the line, can make mistakes.

    By the by, that Science article written by 58 medical professionals tracing the emergence of Ebola—5 of them died from Ebola before it was published.

    (2) General infection rates are terrifying, too. In epidemiology, you measure the “R0,” or “reproduction number” of a virus; that is, how many new infections each infected person causes. When R0 is greater than 1, the virus is spreading through a population. When it’s below 1, the contamination is receding. In September the World Health Organization’s Ebola Response Team estimated the R0 to be at 1.71 in Guinea and 2.02 in Sierra Leone. Since then, it seems to have risen so that the average in West Africa is about 2.0. In September the WHO estimated that by October 20, there would be 3,000 total cases in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. As of October 7, the count was 8,376.

    In other words, rather than catching up with Ebola, we’re falling further behind. And we’re likely to continue falling behind, because physical and human resources do not scale virally. In order to stop the spread of Ebola, the reproduction number needs to be more than halved from its current rate. Yet reducing the reproduction number only gets harder as the total number of cases increases, because each case requires resources—facilities, beds, doctors, nurses, decontamination, and secure burials—which are already lagging well behind need. The latest WHO projections suggest that by December 1 we are likely to see 10,000 new cases in West Africa per week, at which point the virus could begin spreading geographically within the continent as it nears the border with Ivory Coast.

    Thus far, officials have insisted that it will be different in America. On September 30, CDC director Thomas Frieden confirmed the first case of Ebola in the United States, the aforementioned Thomas Duncan. Frieden then declared, “We will stop Ebola in its tracks in the U.S. .  .  . The bottom line here is that I have no doubt that we will control this importation, or this case of Ebola, so that it does not spread widely in this country.”

    The word “widely” is key. Because despite the fact that Duncan was a lone man under scrupulous, first-world care, with the eyes of the entire nation on him, his R0 was 2, just like that of your average Liberian Ebola victim. One carrier; two infections. He passed the virus to nurse Pham and to another hospital worker, Amber Joy Vinson, who flew from Cleveland to Dallas with a low-grade fever before being diagnosed.

    (3) Do you really want to be scared? What’s to stop a jihadist from going to Liberia, getting himself infected, and then flying to New York and riding the subway until he keels over? This is just the biological warfare version of a suicide bomb. Can you imagine the consequences if someone with Ebola vomited in a New York City subway car? A flight from Roberts International in Monrovia to JFK in New York is less than $2,000, meaning that the planning and infrastructure needed for such an attack is relatively trivial. This scenario may be highly unlikely. But so were the September 11 attacks and the Richard Reid attempted shoe bombing, both of which resulted in the creation of a permanent security apparatus around airports. We take drastic precautions all the time, if the potential losses are serious enough, so long as officials are paying attention to the threat.


     
  15. HS Cult Leader

    HS Cult Leader Elite Member Gold

    Reputations:
    102,038
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Messages:
    13,114
    Likes Received:
    18,413
    (4) Let’s put aside the Ebola-as-weapon scenario—some things are too depressing to contemplate at length—and look at the range of scenarios for what we have in front of us, from best-case to worst-case. The epidemiological protocols for containing Ebola rest on four pillars: contact tracing, case isolation, safe burial, and effective public information. On October 14, the New York Times reported that in Liberia, with “only” 4,000 cases, “Schools have shut down, elections have been postponed, mining and logging companies have withdrawn, farmers have abandoned their fields.” Which means that the baseline for “best-case” is already awful.

    In September, the CDC ran a series of models on the spread of the virus and came up with a best-case scenario in which, by January 2015, Liberia alone would have a cumulative 11,000 to 27,000 cases. That’s in a world where all of the aid and personnel gets where it needs to be, the resident population behaves rationally, and everything breaks their way. The worst-case scenario envisioned by the model is anywhere from 537,000 to 1,367,000 cases by January. Just in Liberia. With the fever still raging out of control.

    By which point, all might well be lost. Anthony Banbury is coordinating the response from the United Nations, which, whatever its many shortcomings, is probably the ideal organization to take the lead on Ebola. Banbury’s view is chilling: “The WHO advises within 60 days we must ensure 70 percent of infected people are in a care facility and 70 percent of burials are done without causing further infection. .  .  . We either stop Ebola now or we face an entirely unprecedented situation for which we do not have a plan [emphasis added]”.

    What’s terrifying about the worst-case scenario isn’t just the scale of human devastation and misery. It’s that the various state actors and the official health establishment have already been overwhelmed with infections in only the four-digit range. And if the four pillars—contact tracing, case isolation, safe burial, and effective public information—fail, no one seems to have even a theoretical plan for what to do.

    (5) And by the way, things could get worse. All of those worst-case projections assume that the virus stays contained in a relatively small area of West Africa, which, with a million people infected, would be highly unlikely. What happens if and when the virus starts leaking out to other parts of the world?

    Marine Corps General John F. Kelly talked about Ebola at the National Defense University two weeks ago and mused about what would happen if Ebola reached Haiti or Central America, which have relatively easy access to America. “If it breaks out, it’s literally ‘Katie bar the door,’ and there will be mass migration into the United States,” Kelly said. “They will run away from Ebola, or if they suspect they are infected, they will try to get to the United States for treatment.”

    It isn’t crazy to see how a health crisis could beget all sorts of other crises, from humanitarian, to economic, to political, to existential. If you think about Ebola and mutation and aerosolization and R0 for too long, you start to get visions of Mad Max cruising the postapocalyptic landscape with Katniss Everdeen at his side.

    (6) While we’re on the subject of political crisis, it’s worth noting that the politics of Ebola are uncertain and dangerous to everyone involved. Thus far, there’s been only one serious political clash over Ebola, and that’s concerning the banning of flights to and from the infected countries in West Africa. The Obama administration refuses to countenance such a move, with the CDC’s Frieden flatly calling it “wrong”:

    A travel ban is not the right answer. It’s simply not feasible to build a wall—virtual or real—around a community, city, or country. A travel ban would essentially quarantine the more than 22 million people that make up the combined populations of Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea.

    When a wildfire breaks out we don’t fence it off. We go in to extinguish it before one of the random sparks sets off another outbreak somewhere else.

    We don’t want to isolate parts of the world, or people who aren’t sick, because that’s going to drive patients with Ebola underground, making it infinitely more difficult to address the outbreak. .  .  .

    Importantly, isolating countries won’t keep Ebola contained and away from American shores. Paradoxically, it will increase the risk that Ebola will spread in those countries and to other countries, and that we will have more patients who develop Ebola in the U.S.

    Not terribly convincing, is it? Wildfires, in fact, are often fought by using controlled burns and trench digging to establish perimeters. And it’s a straw-man argument to say that a flight ban wouldn’t keep Ebola fully contained. No one says it would. But by definition, it would help slow the spread of the virus. If there had been a travel ban in place, Thomas Duncan would have likely reached the same sad fate—but without infecting two Americans and setting the virus loose in North America. And it’s difficult to follow the logic by which banning travel from infected countries would create more infections in the United States, as Frieden insists. This is not a paradox; it’s magical thinking.

    Frieden’s entire argument is so strange—and so at odds with what other epidemiologists prescribe—that it can only be explained by one of two causes: catastrophic incompetence or a prior ideological commitment. The latter, in this case, might well be the larger issue of immigration.

    Ebola has the potential to reshuffle American attitudes to immigration. If you agree to seal the borders to mitigate the risks from Ebola, you’re implicitly rejecting the “open borders” mindset and admitting that there are cases in which government has a duty to protect citizens from outsiders. Some people on the left admit to seeing this as the thin end of the wedge. Writing in the New Yorker, Michael Specter lamented, “Several politicians, like Governor Bobby Jindal, of Louisiana, have turned the epidemic into fodder for their campaign to halt immigration.” And that sort of thing just can’t be allowed.

    What would happen in the event of an Ebola outbreak in Latin America? Then America would have to worry about masses of uninfected immigrants surging across the border—not to mention carriers of the virus. And if we had decided it was okay to cut off flights from West Africa, would we decide it was okay to try to seal the Southern border too? You can see how the entire immigration project might start to come apart.

    So for now, the Obama administration will insist on keeping travel open between infected countries and the West and hope that they, and we, get lucky.

    At a deeper level, the Ebola outbreak is a crisis not for Obama and his administration, but for elite institutions. Because once more they have been exposed as either corrupt, incompetent, or both. On September 16, as he was trying to downplay the threat posed by Ebola, President Obama insisted that “the chances of an Ebola outbreak here in the United States are extremely low.” Less then two weeks later, there was an Ebola outbreak in the United States.

    The CDC’s Frieden—who is an Obama appointee—has been almost comically oafish. On September 30, -Frieden declared, “We’re stopping it in its tracks in this country.” On October 13, he said, “We’re concerned, and unfortunately would not be surprised if we did see additional cases.” The next day he admitted that the CDC hadn’t taken the first infection seriously enough: “I wish we had put a team like this on the ground the day the patient, the first patient, was diagnosed,” he said. “That might have prevented this infection. But we will do that from today onward with any case, anywhere in the U.S. .  .  . We could have sent a more robust hospital infection-control team and been more hands-on with the hospital from Day One.”

    The day after that Frieden was asked during a press conference if you could contract Ebola by sitting next to someone on a bus—a question prompted by a statement from President Obama the week before, when he declared that you can’t get Ebola “through casual contact, like sitting next to someone on a bus.”

    Frieden answered: “I think there are two different parts of that equation. The first is, if you’re a member of the traveling public and are healthy, should you be worried that you might have gotten it by sitting next to someone? And the answer is no. Second, if you are sick and you may have Ebola, should you get on a bus? And the answer to that is also no. You might become ill, you might have a problem that exposes someone around you.”

    Go ahead and read that again.

    We have arrived at a moment with our elite institutions where it is impossible to distinguish incompetence from willful misdirection. This can only compound an already dangerous situation.​
     
    Bye You! and SouthernListen like this.
  16. BuffaloTom

    BuffaloTom Closed By User Banned User

    Reputations:
    16,866
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    4,028
    someone please summarize the above for me... Tommy tired....
     
  17. SouthernListen

    SouthernListen I don't follow the crowd. Sorry about that. VIP

    Reputations:
    240,703
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    38,743
    Likes Received:
    39,496
    It'd be bad for business if people didn't get out to the malls as much, fly as much, or hit restaurants as much.
    upload_2014-10-17_9-54-1.jpeg
     
  18. MyLazyHand

    MyLazyHand Russia and France Know What to Do

    Reputations:
    162,029
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    15,280
    Likes Received:
    23,040
    Updated 10/17/14 5:45AM

    Shepard Smith has been admitted to Mercy Hospital in NYC with coughing, fever, and bouts of vomiting. His representatives say that there is no reason to worry, and the chances that he has Ebola are far lower than 50%.
     
  19. SouthernListen

    SouthernListen I don't follow the crowd. Sorry about that. VIP

    Reputations:
    240,703
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    38,743
    Likes Received:
    39,496
    Fox, MSNBC and others were telling us there was nothing to fear in 2006/2007 regarding the housing bust, excessive credit, and the stock market. Peter Schiff, who was right, was portrayed as an alarmist.