News Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking think we should ban killer robots

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by dawg, Jul 28, 2015.

  1. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    132,733
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    138,699
    Likes Received:
    125,638
    View attachment 40104

    You'd think some of the world's greatest minds would be more into artificial intelligence. But not, at least, when it comes to arming it.

    An open letter signed by Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking and Steve Wozniak, among others, is making the case (again) that weaponized robots could lead to "a global AI arms race" that turns self-directed drones into "the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow."

    "We believe that AI has great potential to benefit humanity in many ways, and that the goal of the field should be to do so," the open letter reads. "Starting a military AI arms race is a bad idea, and should be prevented by a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control."

    This isn't the first time these technologists have warned of the dangers of artificial intelligence. Musk has warned before that there "needs to be a lot more work on AI safety," and a previous open letter from Musk, Hawking, Wozniak and others spoke of the "pitfalls" that lay in wait if the research wasn't done carefully.

    [Elon Musk, gaming supernerd]

    The prospect of weaponized autonomous drones is no doubt a tempting one for some militaries: They would be able to compensate for lack of manpower, surprise their enemies and turn war into a virtually bloodless (and therefore relatively cheap) affair. And it would be no surprise if, upon seeing their rivals get hold of the technology, for other countries to want killer robots, too.

    The solution, according to Musk and others, is a ban on autonomous weapons, similar to the kind that governs chemical weapons.

    History suggests that such a ban could be hard to approve, let alone enforce: Despite many major powers signing the 1925 Geneva Protocol banning the use of chemical and biological weapons, other countries such as Japan and the United States did not become signatories until as late as the 1970s, according to the Arms Control Association. And even then, claims were still made about the use of such weapons in violation of the ban.

    P.W. Singer is the author of "Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century" and a researcher at the New America Foundation who studies the future of warfare. When I asked him last month about the chances of the ban on weaponizing outer space surviving through the next few decades, he had this to say:

    Would a treaty hold? I hope it would, because space is the one domain we've not fought in. Yet. History shows it's likely going to be more like the various treaties of the 1920s and 1930s that everyone signed up to. One, they really didn't respect them during the period, like we're seeing with these space weapons tests. But also when push came to shove in an actual war, they junked them.

    Singer added that even though many countries have agreed not to militarize outer space, they still maintain programs "designed to fight in space and deny it to the other side [and] in the last year have ramped up those programs."

    [From unmanned fighters to orbital lasers, how the U.S. and China could fight a war]

    Bans on specific weapons or types of weapons can be extremely complicated. A somewhat less formal — though no less effective — approach that could emerge is simply the general unspoken agreement that using killer drones could be lethal to society.

    This would resemble much more the norm against using nuclear weapons in anger. While there are treaties to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, there isn't such a formal document governing their use. Today we mostly rely on the fear of mutual destruction and voluntary commitments by countries such as China and India on a "no-first-use" policy that only permit the firing of nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear attack.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...en-hawking-think-we-should-ban-killer-robots/
     
    smichal, Shortwave98 and sstressed like this.
  2. Calloused Shins

    Calloused Shins Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,080
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    9,936
    Likes Received:
    16,980
    Don't matter. We make them smarter than us, not difficult, they'll arm themselves. Prepare to make great pets....
     
    Mulletude and reno like this.
  3. AmishGirl

    AmishGirl Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    16,742
    Joined:
    May 12, 2012
    Messages:
    25,480
    Likes Received:
    23,369
    :depressed:
     
    Shortwave98 likes this.
  4. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    132,733
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    138,699
    Likes Received:
    125,638
    Indeed.
     
    Shortwave98 likes this.
  5. sstressed

    sstressed enhancement toker

    Reputations:
    84,184
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    48,352
    Likes Received:
    37,519
    some very bright people are concerned about AI becoming a danger to humanity. that won't stop anything though. there is always some brilliant person with an idea and a guy/government with money who want to see how far they can take things.

    when it comes to war, too many people think it's something that can be a gentlemanly affair, something civilized. when the shit hits the fan, i want every weapon our guys can come up with. enemies are for killing. i don't care how.
     
  6. Pickle Jar

    Pickle Jar Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    435
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    3,773
    Likes Received:
    5,696
    I hope the robots take over the planet and kill all the humans.
     
    Mulletude, Fuzz Nuts and Slow like this.
  7. Hankjones

    Hankjones Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    1,317
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    I for one welcome our new robot overlords
     
  8. Shortwave98

    Shortwave98 A-Number 1 Banned User

    Reputations:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2013
    Messages:
    31,231
    Likes Received:
    31,971
    When they tested the first atomic explosions they weren't sure they wouldn't ignite the atmosphere and burn everybody to a crisp, but they did it anyway.
     
    RenchFries, Droog and SalsMasterShake like this.
  9. shitba

    shitba VIP Extreme VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    3,843
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,275
    Likes Received:
    2,303
    .....
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2016
  10. Droog

    Droog Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    27,546
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    18,199
    Likes Received:
    24,338
    Science fiction is always a good predictor of the future. I honestly believe that technology will be responsible for our demise. It started with nuclear weapons but that's being expanded. Drones, Internet, surveillance, genetically modified crops that can't be stopped, germ warfare.....etc. All of this stuff is in the hands of a race of beings that is too irresponsible to have it. What threat to humanity could anything earthly have been 1000 years ago? The biggest threat was a plague. We've added countless threats in the last century alone.
     
    Mulletude likes this.
  11. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    132,733
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    138,699
    Likes Received:
    125,638
    Our demise is well on it's way. Facebook addiction is not a good thing.

    View attachment 40113
     
    Mulletude, sino8r and Tyler9258 like this.
  12. ilovebacon

    ilovebacon Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    29,902
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    12,278
    Likes Received:
    20,434
    RIP Kyle Reese :bigcry:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Droog

    Droog Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    27,546
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    18,199
    Likes Received:
    24,338
    Neither is Dawgshed addiction! :jj:
     
    sino8r and dawg like this.
  14. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    -150
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    35,997
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    at this point, isn't stephen hawking basically a robot?
     
    Mulletude and sino8r like this.
  15. SouthernListen

    SouthernListen New phone who dis? VIP

    Reputations:
    75,467
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    47,547
    Likes Received:
    52,096
    You can ban it no more than you can ban nukes or any other weapon. The fewer who have a superior weapon the more dangerous things become.
     
  16. Tipsey Russell

    Tipsey Russell VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    41,910
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    16,244
    Likes Received:
    38,472
    it may not happen in my lifetime but I really do think we'll have to battle the robots for survival


    i'm normally not nuts like this but this shit really concerns me
     
    Mulletude likes this.
  17. Afganistand

    Afganistand Motivationally Deficient VIP

    Reputations:
    18,196
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4,314
    Likes Received:
    6,946
    [​IMG]
     
    Hankjones and JameGumb like this.
  18. Goods

    Goods Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    9
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,528
    Likes Received:
    1,703
    Everybody knows all you have to do is upload a virus to the robots and they blow up or something.
     
    sino8r likes this.
  19. agnes

    agnes Big Sexy

    Reputations:
    64,907
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    22,782
    Some people theorize that "robots" are the next step in evolution
     
    Vagineer and dawg like this.
  20. FishySausage

    FishySausage Original Nuttah VIP

    Reputations:
    57,677
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    18,803
    Likes Received:
    33,542
    Did someone say "kill all the humans"?

    [​IMG]
     
    sino8r and dawg like this.