How Many Black Men Do You Have to Murder to Make the Front Page of the New York Times

Discussion in 'The Bar' started by dawg, Oct 11, 2010.

  1. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    540,639
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    119,489
    Likes Received:
    90,775
    After a serial-murder spree that left at least 5 people dead and 13 more wounded, spanning three states and four months, suspected killer Elias Abuelazam was captured at the Atlanta airport Wednesday night as he tried to flee the country. In the series of vicious attacks, a man picked out strangers who were alone on the street, lured them to his vehicle, and then stabbed them with a knife, bludgeoning one with a hammer for variety.





    Want to know more? Pick up a copy of the New York Times. No, not the front page. The front page has a follow-up story on an Alzheimer's research discovery, a follow-up story on the Russian spy scandal, a follow-up story on the "Ground Zero mosque" controversy. Down at the bottom are teasers for the Eat Pray Love review and an online project where readers submitted photos of ugly animals.





    Open up the front. Flip past the International section ("Diving the Depths in a Quest for Pearls and a Connection With Kuwait's Past"). OK, the National section starts on A12. "Green Light and Delay On Same-Sex Marriage"... A13: "Hoping a Pledge to Skip a Salary Resonates With Voters"... "Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect"...




    Oh, there. Page A14.




    "Man Held in Connection With 18 Stabbings, 5 Fatal." Fourteen paragraphs, one reporter, Atlanta dateline. No stringers in Michigan, where the attacks began, or Virginia or Ohio, where they continued. No names of the deceased.




    The story does mention that most of Abuelazam's victims were black men. There's a dispute over whether or not they were singled out because of their raceâ€â€the suspect, Abuelazam, is white and an Israeli immigrantâ€â€but the attacks were savage and predatory either way.




    Not, however, savage or predatory enough to really interest the New York Times. Probably, in its usual tortured-liberal way, the newspaper will realize this was an oversight. Maybe it will send a reporter or two to Flint, Michigan to reconstruct the murders, write sensitive-seeming profiles of the victims, plant the whole thing with fragrant gray word-flowers and spread it all out for the Sunday readers. Or if the racism angle turns out to be true, maybe we'll get a searing portrait of the evil forces that drove the killer.





    Right now, though, what we have is the newspaper's gut reaction. The arrest was announced yesterday morning, so the Times had plenty of opportunity to work the story as hard as the editors thought appropriate:





    Five dead.




    A14.
     
  2. Napoleon V2

    Napoleon V2 New Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    21
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    15,803
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well ppl don't care about blackman obv
     
  3. MrWarmth

    MrWarmth ADORABLE DEPLORABLE Gold

    Reputations:
    174,929
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    90,485
    Likes Received:
    40,908
    Rich people read the New York Times. They are ultra sensitive to really disturbing stuff so you gotta kinda hold the gruesome stuff for the inside pages.
     
  4. Jack-A-Roe

    Jack-A-Roe Active Member

    Reputations:
    48
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    16
    Eliasbboy ! :dropjaw:
     
  5. Jack-A-Roe

    Jack-A-Roe Active Member

    Reputations:
    48
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    16
    Kanye was right :shvoogie:
     
  6. Jack-A-Roe

    Jack-A-Roe Active Member

    Reputations:
    48
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    16
    still havent heard anything about this
     
  7. GSD

    GSD Active Member

    Reputations:
    -156
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,264
    Likes Received:
    0
    I get more news at DawgSaloon than I do through all of the MSM combined
     
  8. ohnoes

    ohnoes New Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    -6
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,070
    Likes Received:
    0
    Parsley Massacre
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search
    In October 1937, Dominican President Rafael Trujillo ordered the execution of the Haitian population living within the borderlands with Haiti. The violence resulted in the killing of 20,000[1] to 30,000[2] Haitian civilians over a span of approximately five days. This would later become known as the Parsley Massacre from the shibboleth that Trujillo had his soldiers apply to determine whether or not those living on the border were native Dominicans who spoke Spanish fluently. Soldiers would hold up a sprig of parsley, ask "What is this?", and assume that those who could not pronounce the Spanish word perejil (called pèsi in Haitian Creole, persil in French) were Haitian.[3] Within the Dominican Republic itself, the massacre is known as El Corte ("the cutting"). [4]

    Contents [hide]
    1 Events
    2 Contributing factors
    3 Repercussions
    4 References in literature
    5 See also
    6 Footnotes

    [edit] Events
    Trujillo, a proponent of antihaitianismo, had made his intentions for the Haitian community clear in a short speech given at a dance held in his honor on 2 October 1937 in Dajabón, stating:

    “ For some months, I have traveled and traversed the border in every sense of the word. I have seen, investigated, and inquired about the needs of the population. To the Dominicans who were complaining of the depredations by Haitians living among them, thefts of cattle, provisions, fruits, etc., and were thus prevented from enjoying in peace the products of their labor, I have responded, ‘I will fix this.’ And we have already begun to remedy the situation. Three hundred Haitians are now dead in Bánica. This remedy will continue.[5] ”

    Trujillo’s actions were reportedly in response to information regarding Haitians stealing cattle and crops from Dominican residents of the borderlands; therefore, the annihilation of an estimated 20,000[1] to 30,000 [2] living within the Dominican border was clearly a direct order of Trujillo. For approximately five days, from 2 October 1937 to 8 October 1937, Haitians were killed with guns, machetes, clubs and knives by Dominican troops, civilians and local political authorities or “alcaldes pedáneos”, some while trying to flee to Haiti by crossing the Rio Artibonito, which has often been the site of bloody conflict between the two nations.[6] Dominican military personnel directly misled fleeing Haitians by telling them they were being deported; however, after being taken to a secluded location the Haitians were executed.[7] To augment the death toll, the main bridge between the Dominican Republic and Haiti was closed, preventing Haitians from fleeing the country. The Parsley Massacre, however, was motivated by Trujillo’s desire to establish a clear border separating the two nations. He also wanted to exercise more political and economic control of the farthest regions of the country, from the rural border lands, to the center of the nation. In the eyes of Trujillo, the presence of Haitian immigrants in Dominican borderlands — which were largely disconnected from Dominican urban life — prohibited the formation of clear political, cultural and social boundaries. It ultimately weakened his attempts to establish an authoritarian regime.[citation needed]

    [edit] Contributing factors
    The Dominican Republic, the former Spanish colony of Santo Domingo, resides on the eastern portion of the island of Hispaniola and occupies two-thirds of the island's land while having just five-million inhabitants.[8] In contrast, Haiti, the former French colony of Saint Domingue, residing on the western portion of the island, occupies the remaining one-third of the landmass, and is very heavily settled with an estimated “500 persons per square mile.”[9] This has resulted in many Haitians being forced to settle lands that were “too mountainous, too eroded or too dry for rewarding farm production”. However, instead of staying on lands incapable of supporting them, many Haitians began to migrate onto Dominican soil where land hunger was low. While Haitians benefited by gaining farm land, Dominicans in the borderlands subsisted mostly on agriculture, and benefited from the ease of exchange of goods with Haitian markets. Due to inadequate roadways connecting the borderlands to major cities, “communication with Dominican markets was so limited that the small commercial surplus of the frontier slowly moved toward Haiti”.[10]

    This posed a possible threat to Trujillo’s regime, because of long-standing border disputes between the two nations: if large numbers of Haitian immigrants began to occupy the less densely populated Dominican borderlands, the Haitian government could have made a case for claiming part of the Dominican Republic's land. Additionally, loose borders allowed contraband to pass freely and without taxes between nations, thus depriving the Dominican Republic of revenue. Furthermore, the Dominican government saw the loose borderlands as a liability — in terms of the formation of revolutionary groups which could flee across the border with ease, while at the same time amassing both weapons and followers.[11]

    [edit] Repercussions
    Despite attempts to blame Dominican citizens, it has been confirmed by U.S. sources that "bullets from Krag rifles were found in Haitian bodies, and only Dominican soldiers had access to this type of rifle”.[12] Therefore, the Haitian Massacre, which is still referred to as el corte (the cutting) by Dominicans and as kouto-a (the knife) by Haitians, was 'a calculated action on the part of Dominican dictator Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina to homogenize the furthest stretches of the country in order to bring the region into the social, political and economic fold',[6] and rid his republic of Haitians.

    Thereafter, Trujillo began to develop the borderlands to link them more closely with urban areas.[13] These areas were modernized with the addition of modern hospitals, schools, political headquarters, military barracks and housing projects, as well as a highway to connect the borderlands to major cities. Additionally, after 1937, quotas restricted the number of Haitians permitted to enter the Dominican Republic, and a strict and often discriminatory border policy was enacted; Haitians continued to be deported and killed in southern frontier regions, while refugees died of exposure, malaria and influenza.[14]

    Of the tens of thousands of ethnic Haitians who were killed, a majority were born in the Dominican Republic and belonged to well-established Haitian communities within the borderlands, thus making them citizens.[15]

    In the end, American President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Haitian President Sténio Vincent sought reparations of $750,000, of which only $525,000 (US$ 7,955,581.4 in 2010) were ever paid: 30 dollars per victim, of which only 2 cents were given to survivors, due to corruption in the Haitian bureaucracy.[16]

    [
     
  9. Dream Theater

    Dream Theater DAWGS E-BULLY Squad Gold

    Reputations:
    188,566
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2010
    Messages:
    25,899
    Likes Received:
    44,332
    Just one:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. ohnoes

    ohnoes New Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    -6
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,070
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm loving Dale's jizz spattered cleavage. :jj: