Is Dawg and Monk's joint bigger than SFN in it's heyday?

Discussion in 'The Bar' started by Mack, Jul 3, 2012.

?

Is Dawg and Monk's joint bigger than SFN in it's heyday?

Poll closed Jul 12, 2012.
  1. Yes

    17.4%
  2. No

    69.6%
  3. I wonder if Lobosco lurks here?

    13.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Mack

    Mack Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,278
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    73,402
    Likes Received:
    23,664
    I'm thinking yes...

    poll to follow
     
  2. MatthewT

    MatthewT Awaiting The Rapture VIP

    Reputations:
    324
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    63,474
    Likes Received:
    8
    not yet, with the slight exception of like a million people trying to see snooki naked :facepalm:
     
  3. Iroth

    Iroth мудак

    Reputations:
    5,720
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Are you kidding me? This place doesn't compare to 2006.
     
  4. MatthewT

    MatthewT Awaiting The Rapture VIP

    Reputations:
    324
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    63,474
    Likes Received:
    8
    we should shoot for 2,000 online in the Bar at one time :cheer2:
     
  5. Mack

    Mack Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,278
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    73,402
    Likes Received:
    23,664
    I don't recall SFN ever posting how many were perusing a given forum at any one time.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2012
  6. Thelonious Davis

    Thelonious Davis Magical negro.

    Reputations:
    57,570
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    22,299
    Likes Received:
    4,454
    who cares
     
  7. Iroth

    Iroth мудак

    Reputations:
    5,720
    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    What?
     
  8. whatsit

    whatsit Dawg Lover VIP

    Reputations:
    16,540
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    48,813
    Likes Received:
    6,754
    It would be if Howard was what he was back then.
     
  9. MatthewT

    MatthewT Awaiting The Rapture VIP

    Reputations:
    324
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    63,474
    Likes Received:
    8
    it was probably a combined number
     
  10. Mack

    Mack Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,278
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    73,402
    Likes Received:
    23,664
    Lambert's thread SMASHED that #
     
  11. Krusty

    Krusty New Member

    Reputations:
    -3
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    I joined there in 2008 . Everyone that joined in 2006 says that it was great then. What the hell was so special about it ?
     
  12. Krusty

    Krusty New Member

    Reputations:
    -3
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    SFN allowed mults , so if they had 2000 people online you could bet that was inflated . Probably closer to 1200 .
     
  13. Mack

    Mack Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,278
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    73,402
    Likes Received:
    23,664
    free handjobs from Jeton for the supporters
     
  14. MatthewT

    MatthewT Awaiting The Rapture VIP

    Reputations:
    324
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    63,474
    Likes Received:
    8
    yeah, the snooki pics

    yikes
     
  15. MatthewT

    MatthewT Awaiting The Rapture VIP

    Reputations:
    324
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    63,474
    Likes Received:
    8
    and now it's preggers :scared:
     
  16. Neesie

    Neesie Princess Parliaments VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    120,201
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    77,627
    Likes Received:
    13,948
    That was a fluke because of the Snookie thing. I love it here, but Iroth is right - this place has nowhere near the regular daily traffic that SFN had in 2006. That's just a fact.
     
  17. dawg

    dawg In The Dog House Staff Member

    Reputations:
    541,456
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    119,617
    Likes Received:
    91,039
    Two things to consider here. However, I do believe SFN was bigger in 2006.

    1. We do not allow mults under any circumstances. So that cuts down on member numbers.

    2. We weed out spammers with a system we have installed that scans a world database. Spammers inflate forum members numbers more than you can imagine.

    It would be cool to know the real numbers.
     
  18. Mack

    Mack Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    196,278
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    73,402
    Likes Received:
    23,664
    Does Lambert's threads cause any logistical problems?
     
  19. Maschine Zeit

    Maschine Zeit Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    -109,138
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    9,254
    Likes Received:
    214
    it was hard to keep up with the SFN threads back in 2006. they moved so fast. i preferred the pre-2006 days myself.
     
  20. Neesie

    Neesie Princess Parliaments VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    120,201
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    77,627
    Likes Received:
    13,948
    Even with that factored in, it's still not as busy here as it was there in 2006. Threads used to move like wildfire there - you could get up from a thread to go pee and when you'd come back there'd be like 5 new pages you had to try to catch up with. That was happening all over General Chat on almost a daily basis back then...

    I'm not putting this place down at all - it's just not as busy here.