Discussion in 'The Bar' started by Mack, Jul 3, 2012.
I'm thinking yes...
poll to follow
not yet, with the slight exception of like a million people trying to see snooki naked
Are you kidding me? This place doesn't compare to 2006.
we should shoot for 2,000 online in the Bar at one time
I don't recall SFN ever posting how many were perusing a given forum at any one time.
It would be if Howard was what he was back then.
it was probably a combined number
Lambert's thread SMASHED that #
I joined there in 2008 . Everyone that joined in 2006 says that it was great then. What the hell was so special about it ?
SFN allowed mults , so if they had 2000 people online you could bet that was inflated . Probably closer to 1200 .
free handjobs from Jeton for the supporters
yeah, the snooki pics
and now it's preggers
That was a fluke because of the Snookie thing. I love it here, but Iroth is right - this place has nowhere near the regular daily traffic that SFN had in 2006. That's just a fact.
Two things to consider here. However, I do believe SFN was bigger in 2006.
1. We do not allow mults under any circumstances. So that cuts down on member numbers.
2. We weed out spammers with a system we have installed that scans a world database. Spammers inflate forum members numbers more than you can imagine.
It would be cool to know the real numbers.
Does Lambert's threads cause any logistical problems?
it was hard to keep up with the SFN threads back in 2006. they moved so fast. i preferred the pre-2006 days myself.
Even with that factored in, it's still not as busy here as it was there in 2006. Threads used to move like wildfire there - you could get up from a thread to go pee and when you'd come back there'd be like 5 new pages you had to try to catch up with. That was happening all over General Chat on almost a daily basis back then...
I'm not putting this place down at all - it's just not as busy here.