Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Jon Hein is God, Feb 27, 2012.
Why is Kimmel so un-Howard-like?
Oprah looks like a burnt raisin.
Nice to see that it only took a failing network to get that fat wildebeest a sense of humor.
Q: How many of these stars did Fa Fa Fuckface get on the show during the past year?
OWN has the worst ratings of any cable channel... i think a test pattern in Bangor, Maine has better ratings then OWN.. it is costing Oprah a ton of money...
and wouldn't it be funny if she burned through all of her money in a few years?? Goes to show you don't fuck with what made you money.. i mean look at Howard
he would never compromise his show or fuck over his own audience , its all about the show no compromises..
see what i did there?
and now a random picture off the internet
The difference is that Howard would never put up his own money in any venture, so he risks nothing. The only thing he loses is his dignity. Did Oprah invest heavily into OWN? I know Discovery Communications owned the channel. I think Oprah put up some money though I don't know how much.
I don't know if she put up her own money.
But the point is that Oprah -- born the same month as Howard -- went from the comfort of her talk show to taking a risk, a big risk. One that may dent her career or may be a huge success. But it's a huge risk in and of itself. She put her reputation on the line.
Howard, meanwhile, is taking a "risk" and putting his "reputation" on the line with America's Got Talent.
Way to go!
Kimmel certainly went to a lot of time and expense to produce the movie clip - didn't he realize you could create comedy gold by just having a bloated oaf read a scene from Footloose after he crashes a press conference?
I can't view the videos right now; I just came in because it's not often you see the words "hilarious" and "Jennifer Aniston" on the same line.
Howard is way too sensitive to be as kool as Jimmy.
Howard will be in next year's Oscar skits.
The Movie bit wasn't all that good but the other one with him pitching show ideas to Oprah was classic.
She did put some small amount of money in to make it look as if she was actually "involved"...but she is not taking the huge hit
financially when it comes to the business of running that cable channel.
She was "given" that channel in a very strange partnership type of deal with the Discovery Networks.
Who knows what the actual terms of that highly secretive deal actually are....but it is most certainly not Oprah's money
at stake...she's *not* that stupid.
What she brought to the table in the deal was herself, her name/brand and her "supposed" audience/fans...and all of the
value(..or non-value.) that is associated with all of that stuff.
A small bit of Oprah's reputation/celebrity is at stake...but with her type of FU money...does anyone really think
that she really cares?
She might care a little bit...enough to get off her ass just enough....but in the end...if all goes bad/downhill..she will
live quite well and survive....she'll probably attempt to stage some other type of "comeback"...or not.
She's not getting any younger..and she doesn't really need the money...she can mainatin a comfortable level
of fame/celebrity by doing little projects here and there every so often.
Well, Howard has FU money, and yet he's doing AGT because he wants to be loved by the masses.
okra needs some more bags under her eyes