I did some more research on Judge Kapnick. As far as I can tell, in cases where she granted summary judgment, she has only been reversed twice in the last five years on appeal. Once in 2009 and once in 2007. Howard is getting some misinformation from his overzealous lawyers. His analysis is way off so I wonder what they are telling him. Juries do not get to interpret contracts, it's a question of law for a Judge. Also, unless the contract is ambiguous, none of this external evidence that he is talking about is going to be allowed into evidence. The appeals court is only going to look at the contract, nothing else. So it doesn't matter what Howard and his team of greedy idiots thinks the contract meant. If it wasn't in the contract, the court isn't going to know about it.