Politics Liberalisms imaginary enemies

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Beth143nacho, Dec 1, 2015.

  1. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,741
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,846
    Likes Received:
    16,581
  2. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,741
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,846
    Likes Received:
    16,581
    [​IMG]
    By
    BRET STEPHENS
    Nov. 30, 2015 7:17 p.m. ET
    653 COMMENTS
    [​IMG]ENLARGE
    President Obama at an opening-day meeting for the Paris climate summit, Nov. 30. PHOTO: POOL/REUTERS
    Little children have imaginary friends. Modern liberalism has imaginary enemies.

    Hunger in America is an imaginary enemy. Liberal advocacy groups routinely claim that one in seven Americans is hungry—in a country where the poorest counties have the highest rates of obesity. The statistic is a preposterous extrapolation from a dubious Agriculture Department measure of “food insecurity.” But the line gives those advocacy groups a reason to exist while feeding the liberal narrative of America as a savage society of haves and have nots.

    The campus-rape epidemic—in which one in five female college students is said to be the victim of sexual assault—is an imaginary enemy. Never mind the debunked rape scandals at Duke and the University of Virginia, or the soon-to-be-debunked case at the heart of “The Hunting Ground,” a documentary about an alleged sexual assault at Harvard Law School. The real question is: If modern campuses were really zones of mass predation—Congo on the quad—why would intelligent young women even think of attending a coeducational school? They do because there is no epidemic. But the campus-rape narrative sustains liberal fictions of a never-ending war on women.

    Opinion Journal Video

    Editorial Page Editor Paul Gigot on what to expect as global leaders meet to talk climate change. Photo credit: Getty Images.
    Institutionalized racism is an imaginary enemy. Somehow we’re supposed to believe that the same college administrators who have made a religion of diversity are really the second coming of Strom Thurmond.Somehow we’re supposed to believe that twice electing a black president is evidence of our racial incorrigibility. We’re supposed to believe this anyway because the future of liberal racialism—from affirmative action to diversity quotas to slavery reparations—requires periodic sightings of the ghosts of a racist past.

    Advertisement
    I mention these examples by way of preface to the climate-change summit that began this week in Paris. But first notice a pattern.

    Dramatic crises—for which evidence tends to be anecdotal, subjective, invisible, tendentious and sometimes fabricated—are trumpeted on the basis of incompetently designed studies, poorly understood statistics, or semantic legerdemain. Food insecurity is not remotely the same as hunger. An abusive cop does not equal a bigoted police department. An unwanted kiss or touch is not the same as sexual assault, at least if the word assault is to mean anything.

    Yet bogus studies and statistics survive because the cottage industries of compassion need them to be believed, and because mindless repetition has a way of making things nearly true, and because dramatic crises require drastic and all-encompassing solutions. Besides, the thinking goes, falsehood and exaggeration can serve a purpose if it induces virtuous behavior. The more afraid we are of the shadow of racism, the more conscious we might become of our own unsuspected biases.

    And so to Paris.

    I’m not the first to notice the incongruity of this huge gathering of world leaders meeting to combat a notional enemy in the same place where a real enemy just inflicted so much mortal damage.

    Then again, it’s also appropriate, since reality-substitution is how modern liberalism conducts political business. What is the central liberal project of the 21st century, if not to persuade people that climate change represents an infinitely greater threat to human civilization than the barbarians—sorry, violent extremists—of Mosul and Molenbeek? Why overreact to a few hundred deaths today when hundreds of thousands will be dead in a century or two if we fail to act now?

    Here again the same dishonest pattern is at work. The semantic trick in the phrase “climate change”—allowing every climate anomaly to serve as further proof of the overall theory. The hysteria generated by an imperceptible temperature rise of 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit since 1880—as if the trend is bound to continue forever, or is not a product of natural variation, or cannot be mitigated except by drastic policy interventions. The hyping of flimsy studies—melting Himalayan glaciers; vanishing polar ice—to press the political point. The job security and air of self-importance this provides the tens of thousands of people—EPA bureaucrats, wind-turbine manufacturers, litigious climate scientists, NGO gnomes—whose livelihoods depend on a climate crisis. The belief that even if the crisis isn’t quite what it’s cracked up to be, it does us all good to be more mindful about the environment.

    And, of course, the chance to switch the subject. If your enemy is global jihad, then to defeat it you need military wherewithal, martial talents and political will. If your enemy is the structure of an energy-intensive global economy, then you need a compelling justification to change it. Climate dystopia can work wonders, provided the jihadists don’t interrupt too often.

    Here’s a climate prediction for the year 2115: Liberals will still be organizing campaigns against yet another mooted social or environmental crisis. Temperatures will be about the same.

    Write bstephens@wsj.com.
     
    matt1357 likes this.
  3. scoobyla

    scoobyla Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,238
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2013
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    8,083
    i didnt read this.
    but why mock the bush and mccain voters.
    they are good people
     
  4. thegroovologist

    thegroovologist Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    140,047
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    10,238
    Likes Received:
    29,691
  5. Habsfan

    Habsfan Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    7,832
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    1,914
    Of course there are hungry people and the obese are only that way because it's cheaper to order 2 pizzas for 15$ at pizza Hut than a bag of lettuce with assorted vegetables and a tray of fresh skinless chicken which will cost around 30$ and still need time to cook it...
     
  6. Abner Devereaux

    Abner Devereaux Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    26,356
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,302
    Likes Received:
    5,772
    article is correct.

    free trade treaties cause more damage to middle class and poor people looking to elevate....both parties supported them so might as well make up shit to pretend they care about those struggling.
     
  7. The Booey

    The Booey Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    112,553
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    11,169
    Likes Received:
    21,191
    Great opening line:

    Little children have imaginary friends. Modern liberalism has imaginary enemies.
     
    ShutUpSitDown likes this.
  8. suckemnuckledus

    suckemnuckledus Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    20,048
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,190
    Likes Received:
    4,701
    [​IMG] I need a fucking foot massage.