Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by GaryPuppet, Mar 3, 2016.
...doubt it. the video is available to anybody why should he be the only one who shouldnt see it. since its his hotel being sued he might have more right than anybody to see it.
"A waitress said she watched all 3 people at the table as they mocked Erin's body."
I want to hear that testimony. What exactly were they mocking?
I also want to see the three jerkoffs that think they're such better human specimens.
The law is so strange. I thought Marriott's exposure in this suit resulted from one of their employees effectively giving a stranger the room number of Ms. Andrews. How do the actions of some exec watching a video clip years later bear on this legally one way or the other?
Sounds like 3 nerds from the DS.
because its smart. so he doesnt lose a lot of money.
You got that right
You don't watch porno with your buddies at the dinner table? It's agreat activity
I doubt they were negatively mocking her. Probably making comments about what they'd do to that and those.
this guy is most likely gonna be an ex-executive at marriot real soon
Right?! She's got a gorgeous body.
"Mocked her body"
Don't give a fuck who's telling the truth, anyone mocking her body can suck my johnson rod.
Her lawyer is trying to impeach his credibility as a witness while at the same time make the jury think Marriott has a negligent attitude towards security.
The guy is fucking idiot for testifying to that
I read somewhere that her attorneys were trying to prove the damage done was not a one time thing... that it will be ongoing and recurring issue during her life (videos living forever on Internet). IE long term damages $$.
If true, the Marriott guy is an idiot. If you are going through legal issues and your company's actions are on trial, mind your damn Ps and Qs for awhile. Try to not be an asshole for just a bit.
I agree with Tipsey, this fella will be an ex-exec soon enough.
I've only followed the case superficially. What is he supposedly a witness to?
Okay, that would make more sense.
If the dick didn't get stiff you must acquit
I don't know. Technically he would be a RMO(responsible management official)