Politics More censorship - Twitter locks conservative account (@JamesOKeefeIII)

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by thegroovologist, Oct 13, 2016.

  1. thegroovologist

    thegroovologist Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    140,416
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    10,258
    Likes Received:
    29,764
  2. bennymuso

    bennymuso Italian by name, British by nature

    Reputations:
    33,978
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    3,481
    What's he going to do for 11 hours, marathon jerk off session.
     
  3. Tipsey Russell

    Tipsey Russell VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    123,300
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    10,913
    Likes Received:
    25,705
    I can't read twitter posts

    all the symbols really mess with me
    it's like some riley martin shit without any of the interesting parts
     
  4. Daveindiego

    Daveindiego Confirmed Internet Legend Gold

    Reputations:
    449,616
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    74,986
    Likes Received:
    29,486
    Jesus, this Euro fag is the stupidest motherfucker.

    Someone should explain to him what censorship is.
     
    FeetToTaste and Anyonenow like this.
  5. Daveindiego

    Daveindiego Confirmed Internet Legend Gold

    Reputations:
    449,616
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    74,986
    Likes Received:
    29,486
    James Okeefe is one of the worlds most despicable pieces of shit. Glad that Twitter shut him down.
     
    Infinity likes this.
  6. thegroovologist

    thegroovologist Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    140,416
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    10,258
    Likes Received:
    29,764
    Another hidden cam video:

    Huma Abdin:
    "We can not turn these people away."




    ---






    [​IMG]
    "Huma Abedin worked at a radical Muslim journal for a dozen years


    Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.


    One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign Web site is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.

    However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-First Lady Clinton.

    Headlined “Women’s Rights are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.

    “A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.)

    “Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood,” it added.

    In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women.

    “‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women.

    “By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.”

    “Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.”

    She seemed to rationalize domestic abuse as a result of “the stress and frustrations that men encounter in their daily lives.” While denouncing such violence, she didn’t think it did much good to punish men for it.

    She added in her 31-page treatise: “More men are victims of domestic violence than women . . . If we see the world through ‘men’s eyes’ we will find them suffering from many hardships and injustices.”

    She opposed the UN conference widening the scope of the definition of the family to include “gay and lesbian ‘families.’ ”

    Huma Abedin does not apologize for her mother’s views. “My mother was traveling around the world to these international women’s conferences talking about women’s empowerment, and it was normal,” she said in a recent profile in Vogue.

    Huma continued to work for her mother’s journal through 2008. She is listed as “assistant editor” on the masthead of the 2002 issue in which her mother suggested the US was doomed to be attacked on 9/11 because of “sanctions” it leveled against Iraq and other “injustices” allegedly heaped on the Muslim world. Here is an excerpt:

    “The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.”

    Huma Abedin is Clinton’s longest-serving and, by all accounts, most loyal aide. The devout, Saudi-raised Muslim started working for her in the White House, then followed her to the Senate and later the State Department. She’s now helping run Clinton’s presidential campaign as vice chair and may end up back in the White House.

    The contradictions are hard to reconcile. The campaign is not talking, despite repeated requests for interviews.

    Until now, these articles which Abedin helped edit and publish have remained under wraps. Perhaps Clinton was unaware she and her mother took such opposing views.

    But that’s hard to believe. Her closest adviser served as an editor for that same Saudi propaganda organ for a dozen years. The same one that in 1999 published a book, edited by her mother, that justifies the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation under Islamic law, while claiming “man-made laws have in fact enslaved women.”

    And in 2010, Huma Abedin arranged for then-Secretary of State Clinton to speak alongside Abedin’s hijab-wearing mother at an all-girls college in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. According to a transcript of the speech, Clinton said Americans have to do a better job of getting past “the stereotypes and the mischaracterizations” of the oppressed Saudi woman. She also assured the audience of burqa-clad girls that not all American girls go “around in a bikini bathing suit.”

    At no point in her long visit there, which included a question-and-answer session, did this so-called champion of women’s rights protest the human-rights violations Saudi women suffer under the Shariah laws that Abedin’s mother actively promotes. Nothing about the laws barring women from driving or traveling anywhere without male “guardians.”

    If fighting for women’s rights is one of Clinton’s greatest achievements, why has she retained as her closest adviser a woman who gave voice to harsh Islamist critiques of her Beijing platform?"


    http://nypost.com/2016/08/21/huma-abedin-worked-at-a-radical-muslim-journal-for-10-years
     
  7. shamrackle

    shamrackle Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    -7,488
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2015
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    518

    I thought I was the only one.
     
  8. Pussy Tendon

    Pussy Tendon Wet! CUNT!!!!! Gold

    Reputations:
    37,837
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    5,229
    Has any of the SJW side been shut-out, too?
     
  9. Snotty

    Snotty My Snothand be strong!!! VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    83,252
    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Messages:
    25,259
    Likes Received:
    17,723
    Said like a good Nazi.......Your Frau'her will be proud!!!
     
  10. Daveindiego

    Daveindiego Confirmed Internet Legend Gold

    Reputations:
    449,616
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    74,986
    Likes Received:
    29,486
    Shut up, stupid. Go cry about more nonexistent censorship.
     
  11. The Finklestein Kid

    The Finklestein Kid Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    10,146
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2015
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    1,685
    Private organization, they can ban whoever they want.
     
    Darkblue and Daveindiego like this.
  12. Dorb

    Dorb Lovable Old Pig VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    125,049
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    17,506
    Likes Received:
    18,555
    If twitter bans someone they probably have a good reason for doing so which we know nothing about.
     
  13. DogStar69

    DogStar69 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    -130,754
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    28,958
    Likes Received:
    15,773
    12 hours WAAHHHHHH
     
  14. FeetToTaste

    FeetToTaste Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    30,332
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    3,305
    Likes Received:
    6,557
    Didn't you know that the Right wants more governmental regulation of private businesses? I know they've generally been against it, but when it favors their side they are all for it!
     
  15. jrstinkfish

    jrstinkfish The Slow Adult VIP

    Reputations:
    18,865
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,955
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    https://www.codias.com/

    A good place to go for people who think Twitter censors conservative ideas. Wonder how long before this one fails like the other attempts at creating a "conservative" social media platform.
     
  16. thegroovologist

    thegroovologist Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    140,416
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    10,258
    Likes Received:
    29,764
    They locked him out permanently >>>




    Here's his new hidden cam video:

    "In this video released by Project Veritas Action, James O’Keefe exposes Hillary Clinton’s plan to ban all guns through an executive order. In the video, James O’Keefe attends a private top donor campaign fundraiser for Democratic Senate candidate Russ Feingold. He attended the fundraiser the same day that a Project Veritas journalist was burned in the Feingold campaign.

    While at the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.”"


     
    Cookie_Puss and CrucifiedAGT like this.
  17. DDragon

    DDragon VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    49,912
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,221
    Likes Received:
    12,188
    Not really. I follow a conservative woman on there and she gets threatened and nothing is done. Seems they allow hate speech on there if its from the left.
     
  18. Head Censor

    Head Censor Turgid Member VIP

    Reputations:
    393,586
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,348
    Likes Received:
    26,950
    That's the American spirit, Dorb. :facepalm:


    "Eh, Yuri, if Comrade Stalin sent millions of people to the gulags, he probably had a good reason for doing so which we know nothing about."

    [​IMG]


    So what you're telling us then, is that some insignificant little mom and pop bakery which refuses to bake a same sex wedding cake can be adjudged a "public accommodation" and then fined out of existence, but one of the largest social media networks on the planet is not considered a public accommodation and therefore is free to discriminate against people on the basis of their political views?

    Does that sound right to you?
     
  19. Dorb

    Dorb Lovable Old Pig VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    125,049
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    17,506
    Likes Received:
    18,555
    Why you bring up these Russian Trump supporters?
    If someone on twitter, a hacker for example, is trying to destroy or corrupt or change other peoples tweets, then twitter should ban them. You dont really know why these people are banned
     
  20. Daveindiego

    Daveindiego Confirmed Internet Legend Gold

    Reputations:
    449,616
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    74,986
    Likes Received:
    29,486
    You do realize that Twitter is not entitled to the rights bestowed by the US Constitution, right?