N.Y.T. "All The News That's Fit To Print"... Until It Disagrees With Our Pro-Islam Agenda!

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by HS Cult Leader, Jan 9, 2015.

  1. HS Cult Leader

    HS Cult Leader Elite Member Gold

    Reputations:
    101,912
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Messages:
    13,116
    Likes Received:
    18,421
    New York Times Reports On Muslim Proselytizing During Charlie Hebdo Attack, Then Deletes It

    1:35 PM 01/08/2015

    Jim Treacher

    [​IMG]




    When Islamic terrorists expressly tell their victims why they’re being attacked, our mainstream media will do anything to cover it up. They’ll change the subject, they’ll blame the victims… they’ll even stealth-edit* their own copy.
    Here’s the latest example of the New York Times censoring itself to avoid offending Muslims after an act of Islamic terror.
    This morning, BenK at Ace of Spades quoted an NYT story by Liz Alderman titled “Survivors Retrace a Scene of Horror at Charlie Hebdo.” Take note of these two paragraphs from that story:

    Sigolène Vinson, a freelancer who had decided to come in that morning to take part in the meeting, thought she would be killed when one of the men approached her.

    Instead, she told French news media, the man said, “I’m not going to kill you because you’re a woman, we don’t kill women, but you must convert to Islam, read the Quran and cover yourself,” she recalled.

    I was intrigued by this quote, and it seemed worth exploring, so I went to the NYT story to quote it. But guess what?

    Here’s what it says now:

    Sigolène Vinson, a freelance journalist who had come in that morning to take part in the meeting, said that when the shooting started, she thought she would be killed.

    Ms. Vinson said in an interview that she dropped to the floor and crawled down the hall to hide behind a partition, but one of the gunmen spotted her and grabbed her by the arm, pointing his gun at her head. Instead of pulling the trigger, though, he told her she would not be killed because she was a woman.

    “Don’t be afraid, calm down, I won’t kill you,” the gunman told her in a steady voice, with a calm look in his eyes, she recalled. “You are a woman. But think about what you’re doing. It’s not right.”

    Nothing about telling her to convert to Islam. Nothing about telling her to read the Quran. Nothing about telling her to cover her face.

    Nothing about the very reason these animals did this.

    So, imagine yourself as an NYT editor for a moment, if you can withstand the nausea. Why would you specifically take out the part about the Islamic terrorist proselytizing for Islam in the middle of the terrorist attack? Why delete this woman’s account of being threatened at gunpoint and being told to convert to Islam?

    That’s easy. Because you’re one of America’s moral, ethical, and intellectual betters, and you don’t want it to be true. Your reporter hastily left that inconvenient truth in her story by accident, so you airbrushed it out, without any acknowledgment, to preserve the narrative. You turned it into, “Hey, maybe these guys aren’t so bad after all. They didn’t kill the women, right? Let’s not be too hasty.”

    Because that’s your job.

    The New York Times is garbage.

    Update: In case you’re still confused…

    @jtLOL Right on cue, other media outlets are distributing the sanitized, de-Islamized NYT version of the quote. http://t.co/UuA08UMToo

    — John Hayward (@Doc_0) January 8, 2015

    Update: From Radio France Internationale, translated into English.

    [​IMG]
    *I take that back. It’s not a stealth-edit. It’s a damn lie.
     
    Head Censor likes this.
  2. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    170,081
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    36,004
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    Goebbels is blushing in his grave.
     
  3. Head Censor

    Head Censor Turgid Member VIP

    Reputations:
    394,448
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,397
    Likes Received:
    27,079
    Gotta stick to the script above all else.
     
  4. Head Censor

    Head Censor Turgid Member VIP

    Reputations:
    394,448
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,397
    Likes Received:
    27,079
    What did they call that in RoboCop? The prime directive?
     
  5. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    I could be wrong, but I think they're quoting to two separate conversions from the terrorists with the same person.
     
  6. PI Nate

    PI Nate Disenfranchised since 1984... Gold

    Reputations:
    272,563
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    52,405
    Likes Received:
    52,410
    CNN is blaming Bush...

    "The brothers were moved to action after seeing the disturbing images of Abu-Ghraib."


    :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


    :nocheer:
     
    Nemo likes this.
  7. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    Now I got it, she was misquoted and the NY Times got the real story...

    "She disputed a quotation attributed to her and carried on the website of the French radio service RFI stating that the gunman had told her she should convert to Islam, read the Quran and cover herself. Instead, she told The New York Times in an interview, the gunman told her: “Don’t be afraid, calm down, I won’t kill you.” He spoke in a steady voice, she said, with a calm look in his eyes, saying: “ ‘You are a woman. But think about what you’re doing. It’s not right.’ ” Then she said he turned to his partner, who was still shooting, and shouted: “We don’t shoot women! We don’t shoot women! We don’t shoot women!”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/09/w...trace-a-scene-of-horror-at-charlie-hebdo.html

    Move along, nothing to see here.:nyah:
     
  8. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    170,081
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    36,004
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    So your argument is that the first thing they printed was a lie, not the second thing?
     
  9. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    No, I'm saying the got that facts straight from the horses mouth and not some internet wacko.

    :pony:
     
  10. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    170,081
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    36,004
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    You have to do a better job of understanding how to read. The NYT printed the version that you incorrectly identified as originating from "some internet wacko."

    :console:Conscious thought is not that hard
     
  11. greyt

    greyt Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    11,008
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    3,051
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    but they do behead and murder women who shame their family

    :dontknow:
     
  12. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102

    Wrong, but keep thinking the world is against you.
     
  13. PI Nate

    PI Nate Disenfranchised since 1984... Gold

    Reputations:
    272,563
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    52,405
    Likes Received:
    52,410
    "We have to be accepting of other cultures. Who are you to judge?!"

    [​IMG]
     
  14. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    170,081
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    36,004
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    "Wrong"? :haha:
    Terrific one word rebuttal: at least you're tacitly admitting that you didn't read the article correctly
     
  15. SouthernListen

    SouthernListen I don't follow the crowd. Sorry about that. VIP

    Reputations:
    240,706
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    38,744
    Likes Received:
    39,497
    Believing anything read in the NYT is accurate and unbiased is a litmus test for intelligence and gullibility.
     
  16. slats7

    slats7 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    18,785
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    1,709
    that's a very specific quote. is she alleging that the reporter made it up out of whole cloth? very unlikely. looks like she's covering for her censorious left-wing buddies at the Times.
     
    PI Nate likes this.
  17. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    What part of "She (Sigolène Vinson) disputed a quotation attributed to her and carried on the website of the French radio service RFI"...?

    Two quotes, one she confirms and the other she disputes. Come on, you really can't be that ignorant.
     
  18. ltd86

    ltd86 Racist Banned User

    Reputations:
    170,081
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    36,004
    Likes Received:
    35,131
    Okay....so why did the Times publish both?
     
  19. Tinman

    Tinman Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    88,733
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,206
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    Publish as in print or Published on a website and was changed when the FACTS from the horses mouth were brought to there attention?
     
  20. BethsZygote

    BethsZygote In Utero VIP

    Reputations:
    3,561
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,609
    Likes Received:
    733
    I didnt read the article because the formatting and bolding looks like an abortion