Nixon's Checkers Speech

Discussion in 'The Bar' started by RH Goatcabin, Dec 6, 2015.

  1. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
    ...discuss


    [​IMG]
     
  2. zhukov

    zhukov Time traveler Gold

    Reputations:
    90,211
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    30,381
    Likes Received:
    9,916
    1950s breaking news
     
  3. Avery

    Avery Well-Known Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    133,878
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    44,521
    Likes Received:
    24,207
    Dick, Tricky :nojj:
     
  4. DarkFriday

    DarkFriday Fired as a MOD...Twice. Gold

    Reputations:
    718,324
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    172,001
    Likes Received:
    87,139
    Goat fail :facepalm:
     
  5. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
    Goat pain. :bigcry:
     
    DarkFriday likes this.
  6. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
    My Fellow Americans,

    I come before you tonight as a candidate for the Vice-presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity has been questioned.

    Now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is to either ignore them or to deny them without giving details. I believe we have had enough of that in the United States, particularly with the present administration in Washington D.C.

    To me, the office of the Vice-presidency of the United States is a great office, and I feel that the people have got to have confidence in the integrity of the men who run for that office and who might attain them.

    I have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. And that is why I am here tonight. I want to tell you my side of the case.

    I am sure that you have read the charges, and you have heard it, that I, Senator Nixon, took $18,000 from a group of my supporters.

    Now, was that wrong? And let me say that it was wrong. I am saying it, incidentally, that it was wrong, just not illegal, because it isn't a question of whether it was legal or illegal, that isn't enough. The question is, was it morally wrong? I say that it was morally wrong if any of that $18,000 went to Senator Nixon, for my personal use. I say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given and secretly handled.

    And I say that it was morally wrong if any of the contributors got special favors for the contributions that they made.

    And to answer those questions let me say this--not a cent of the $18,000 or any other money of that type ever went to me for my personal use. Every penny of it was used to pay for political expenses that I did not think should be charged to the taxpayers of the United States.

    It was not a secret fund. As a matter of fact, when I was on "Meet the Press"--some of you may have seen it last Sunday--Peter Edson came up to me after the program, and he said, "Dick, what about this fund we hear about?" And I said, "Well, there is no secret about it. Go out and see Dana Smith who was the administrator of the fund," and I gave him his address. And I said you will find that the purpose of the fund simply was to defray political expenses that I did not feel should be charged to the government.

    And third, let me point out, and I want to make this particularly clear, that no contributor to this fund, no contributor to any of my campaigns, has ever received any consideration that he would not have received as an ordinary constituent.

    I just don't believe in that, and I can say that never, while I have been in the Senate of the United States, as far as the people that contributed to this fund are concerned, have I made a telephone call to an agency, nor have I gone down to an agency on their behalf.

    And the records will show that--the records which are in the hands of the administration.

    Well, then, some of you will say, and rightly, "Well, what did you use the fund for, Senator? Why did you have to have it?"

    Let me tell you in just a word how a Senate office operates. First of all, the Senator gets $15,000 a year in salary. He gets enough money to pay for one trip a year, a round trip, that is, for himself, and his family between his home and Washington D.C. And then he gets an allowance to handle the people that work in his office to handle his mail.

    And the allowance for my State of California, is enough to hire 13 people. And let me say, incidentally, that this allowance is not paid to the Senator.

    It is paid directly to the individuals, that the Senator puts on his payroll, but all of these people and all of these allowances are for strictly official business--business, for example, when a constituent writes in and wants you to go down to the Veteran's Administration and get some information about his GI policy--items of that type for example. But there are other expenses that are not covered by the government. And I think I can best discuss those expenses by asking you some questions.

    Do you think that when I or any other Senator makes a political speech, has it printed, should charge the printing of that speech and the mailing of that speech to the taxpayers?

    Do you think, for example, when I or any other Senator makes a trip to his home state to make a purely political speech that the cost of that trip should be charged to the taxpayers?

    Do you think when a Senator makes political broadcasts or political television broadcasts, radio or television, that the expense of those broadcasts should be charged to the taxpayers?

    I know what your answer is. It is the same answer that audiences give me whenever I discuss this particular problem.

    The answer is no. The taxpayers should not be required to finance items which are not official business but which are primarily political business.

    Well, then the question arises, you say, "Well, how do you pay for these and how can you do it legally?" And there are several ways, that it can be done, incidentally, and it is done legally in the United States Senate and in the Congress.

    The first way is to be a rich man. So I couldn't use that.

    Another way that is used is to put your wife on the payroll. Let me say, incidentally, that my opponent, my opposite number for the Vice-presidency on the Democratic ticket, does have his wife on the payroll and has had her on his payroll for the past ten years. Now let me just say this--That is his business, and I am not critical of him for doing that. You will have to pass judgment on that particular point, but I have never done that for this reason:

    I have found that there are so many deserving stenographers and secretaries in Washington that needed the work that I just didn't feel it was right to put my wife on the payroll--My wife sitting over there.

    She is a wonderful stenographer. She used to teach stenography and she used to teach shorthand in high school. That was when I met her. And I can tell you folks that she has worked many hours on Saturdays and Sundays in my office, and she has done a fine job, and I am proud to say tonight that in the six years I have been in the Senate of the United States, Pat Nixon has never been on the government payroll.

    What are the other ways that these finances can be taken care of? Some who are lawyers, and I happen to be a lawyer, continue to practice law, but I haven't been able to do that.

    I am so far away from California and I have been so busy with my senatorial work that I have not engaged in any legal practice, and, also, as far as law practice is concerned, it seemed to me that the relationship between an attorney and the client was so personal that you couldn't possibly represent a man as an attorney and then have an unbiased view when he presented his case to you in the event that he had one before government.

    And so I felt that the best way to handle these necessary political expenses of getting my message to the American people and the speeches I made--the speeches I had printed for the most part concerned this one message of exposing this administration, the Communism in it, the corruption in it--the only way I could do that was to accept the aid which people in my home state of California, who contributed to my campaign and who continued to make these contributions after I was elected, were glad to make.

    And let me say that I am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me for a special favor. I am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me to vote on a bill other than my own conscience would dictate. And I am proud of the fact that the taxpayers by subterfuge or otherwise have never paid one dime for expenses which I thought were political and should not be charged to the taxpayers.

    Let me say, incidentally, that some of you may say, "Well, that is all right, Senator, that is your explanation, but have you got any proof?" And I would like to tell you this evening that just an hour ago we received an independent audit of this entire fund. I suggested to Governor Sherman Adams, who is the chief of staff of the Eisenhower campaign, that an independent audit and legal report be obtained, and I have that audit in my hand.

    It is an audit made by Price Waterhouse & Co. firm, and the legal opinion by Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, lawyers in Los Angeles, the biggest law firm, and incidentally, one of the best ones in Los Angeles.

    I am proud to report to you tonight that this audit and legal opinion is being forwarded to General Eisenhower and I would like to read to you the opinion that was prepared by Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, based on all the pertinent laws, and statutes, together with the audit report prepared by the certified public accountants.
     
  7. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
  8. DarkFriday

    DarkFriday Fired as a MOD...Twice. Gold

    Reputations:
    718,324
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    172,001
    Likes Received:
    87,139
  9. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
    11 minutes. Blarked. :nojj:
     
    DarkFriday likes this.
  10. Dirty South

    Dirty South Large Member

    Reputations:
    267,947
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    24,627
    Likes Received:
    25,054
    The news filters in a little slower in Montaner.
     
    DarkFriday likes this.
  11. RH Goatcabin

    RH Goatcabin Notable Member VIP

    Reputations:
    162,230
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    80,464
    Likes Received:
    21,502
    Time warp