Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by skylarbrie, Dec 21, 2013.
Are you the one that posted that Katy Perry and her boyfriend are Satan worshipers?
guilty. why are celebs so bold with their outward display of devotion to satan, in decades past, it was truly a secret society...the reason is: they control the entire industry, and are embedded with politicians of both parties...
i don't see anything wrong with satan worshiping. if people want to bow down to someone and they choose to pray to someone who supposedly hates them, so what? besides, if the stories are correct, lucifer is the only reason we have a society today, and are not just naive herds of 2 legged sheep.
i prefer that they worship something, even if it is the flying spaghetti monster, rather than praying to nothing at all. i think that, mostly the only person anyone is ever truthful to, is whatever they choose to pray to, so who cares if they choose satan, a dog, god, a potato that looks like jesus, etc.
or somebody is using "Satanism" like any other religion to control them.
The Satanist promise fortune and fame...they actually deliver on their promise...all they ask you for is your soul, attendance at regular satanic rituals that are straight from hell and your never ending commitment to recruit new members...it is said that you cannot gain a contract without devoting your life to satan
i see what you done did thar...i see
Interesting. But what if you pray to nothing, yet find the value of truth to be most important? Science, in essence, is the pursuit of truth. Is truth and science worthy of worship, or does it have to be some deity or supernatural concept?
OP is creepy
nothing is worthy of worship. be it buddha, puntang or science.
n and r
prior to the 20th cent. what we now know as science is largely self proven based upon the observation of local phenomena and inferred to be the same everywhere, and the highest mathematics of that time is calculus which is largely a self-verifying thought experiment of estimation and gesstimation invented by an insane genius who devotedly believed in god and satan. basically it is the science of extrapolation and the belief in that "science".. since the 20th cent we transitioned to the science of the unknowable: quantum mechanics by definition cannot be directly observed, must be inferred and described by esoteric math that often reflects the phenomena we infer. string theory can never be proven, only inferred yet it is the leading theory of everything. some of our best current physicists believe they can demonstrate that reality is just a hologram.
our science and mathematics is the science of belief and the math of imagination using the dogmatic terminology of our current society. what is so different? why is the "truth" of this science any different than the truth of the religious believers?
what makes your "truth" any better than theirs?