Politics Senate Judiciary Republicans Vow: No Hearing for Supreme Court Nominee

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Tim, Feb 23, 2016.

  1. Tim

    Tim ty dawg for gold! Gold

    Reputations:
    146,511
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Messages:
    6,814
    Likes Received:
    16,777
    The Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have officially declared they will not hold a hearing on anyone President Obama nominates for the Supreme Court.

    In a letter today, signed by all 11 Republicans on the 20-member committee, the members tell their Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, they will “not hold hearings on any Supreme Court nominee until after our next president is sworn in on January 20, 2017.”

    [​IMG]
     
    Dirty South and Mike Huntslooce like this.
  2. scoobyla

    scoobyla Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,238
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2013
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    8,083
    whats the point of a letter.
    everyone already knew this.
     
    Droog and Head Censor like this.
  3. chapped

    chapped Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    384,616
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    55,632
    Likes Received:
    61,906
    This will make President Clinton happy
     
  4. FeetToTaste

    FeetToTaste Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    30,080
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2014
    Messages:
    3,297
    Likes Received:
    6,523
    Seems like a really smart bunch.

    :lol1:
     
  5. chapped

    chapped Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    384,616
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    55,632
    Likes Received:
    61,906
    The point? They are cocksuckers is my guess
     
  6. Tim

    Tim ty dawg for gold! Gold

    Reputations:
    146,511
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Messages:
    6,814
    Likes Received:
    16,777
    To keep their voters calm, I think.
     
    scoobyla likes this.
  7. YinzerMasshole

    YinzerMasshole VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    78,438
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    3,713
    Likes Received:
    8,054
    In England, when the government runs for re-election, members of Parliament clean out their desks and cannot go to the office, debate laws, or draw their salary, until they are re-elected.

    If American elected officials would like to stop working until the next election, because they only feel right respecting the decision of the next election, they can feel free to clear their shit out of their desks.
     
    Morrisb, Hugh Janus, ramble and 11 others like this.
  8. chapped

    chapped Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    384,616
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    55,632
    Likes Received:
    61,906
     
    Skycoaster likes this.
  9. a mysterious man

    a mysterious man Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    123,639
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    2,501
    The "Honorable" Mitch McConnell?

    What the fuck? :facepalm:
     
    Morrisb, Hugh Janus, ramble and 9 others like this.
  10. CrucifiedAGT

    CrucifiedAGT He's Around VIP

    Reputations:
    334,089
    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    11,664
    Likes Received:
    24,493
    There is no precedent to block a Supreme Court Justice on this basis!

    Sincerely;

    Barack Obama
    Chuck Schumer
    Joe Biden
     
  11. RoachCoachJokes

    RoachCoachJokes Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    4,271
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    941
    Hey Repub senators, do your jobs.

    Polls in swing states, where many vulnerable Repub senators are up for re-election this year, show that most voters agree, as spelled out in the constitution, that the prez has every right to expect that his nominee will get a hearing.

    Way to hand the Dems a winning issue. I love it.
     
  12. scoobyla

    scoobyla Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,238
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2013
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    8,083
    why do they gotta vow in writing. their word isnt good? :dontknow:
     
    RoachCoachJokes likes this.
  13. HypocriteHowie

    HypocriteHowie Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    111,032
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    4,021
    Likes Received:
    12,523
    Did they send it to Iran again? :dontknow:
     
  14. CrucifiedAGT

    CrucifiedAGT He's Around VIP

    Reputations:
    334,089
    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    11,664
    Likes Received:
    24,493
    New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

    “We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”



    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2007/...ew-bush-high-court-picks-005146#ixzz411sQCRFy
     
  15. scoobyla

    scoobyla Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,238
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2013
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    8,083




    shumars a liberal who wanted to do something liberal.

    we want the 'conservatives' to be just like the liberals, thats standards we have?


    what is wrong with waiting to see who the person is, then voting against him or her if u think they not good for the country? wasnt that the original intention
     
    Nice and FrstTimeLngTme like this.
  16. DarkFriday

    DarkFriday Fired as a MOD...Twice. Gold

    Reputations:
    718,690
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    172,017
    Likes Received:
    87,211
    Fuck doing what yer elected to do!
    Fuck the public!
    Fuck the country!
    Never compromise!
    Never accomplish ANYTHING!!!

    America!!
    Fuck Yeah!!!
    :facepalm:
     
  17. Tim

    Tim ty dawg for gold! Gold

    Reputations:
    146,511
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Messages:
    6,814
    Likes Received:
    16,777
    It's not that simple. Obama would almost definitely nominate someone who would be bad for the country.
     
    BrulesRules, the G-man and DarkFriday like this.
  18. DarkFriday

    DarkFriday Fired as a MOD...Twice. Gold

    Reputations:
    718,690
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    172,017
    Likes Received:
    87,211
    I know.
    I just wanted to bold my text :shucks:
     
  19. scoobyla

    scoobyla Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    35,238
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2013
    Messages:
    10,800
    Likes Received:
    8,083
    so vote the person down then.
    how is that not simple?
     
  20. HowieHasBeen

    HowieHasBeen VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    19,588
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    5,382
    Actually, they are. They are invoking the "Biden Rule". Dem's used it first. :)

     
    Diogenes, Nice, Head Censor and 3 others like this.