Spoiled Rotten Pets Ratings for First Episodes

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Uncle Larry, Apr 23, 2013.

  1. Uncle Larry

    Uncle Larry Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    7,683
  2. knu3421

    knu3421 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    22,801
    Likes Received:
    5,996
    No way.
     
  3. ApeFace

    ApeFace Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    1,197
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,888
    Likes Received:
    9,812
    That almost seems respectable. I couldn't imagine 50,000 people watching that dreck.
     
  4. slab0meat

    slab0meat negative creep VIP

    Reputations:
    1,474
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,933
    Likes Received:
    4,620
    Sounds way too high. Does the channel even have that many overall?


    Is sonofthebronx a Buchwald client?
     
  5. Micheal Kenyon

    Micheal Kenyon Here

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Messages:
    11,406
    Likes Received:
    13,035
    I don't believe it.
     
  6. MobyDick

    MobyDick Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    592
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    6,386
    Likes Received:
    6,621
    most if not all of them are just watching it because it's a new show with animals in it. It could be anybody hosting it. Beth brought zero point zero to the table.
     
  7. skylarbrie

    skylarbrie VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    10,598
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    10,794
    Likes Received:
    7,409
    that's a .028 rating, successful shows are at approximately 1.0
     
  8. NotMyBro

    NotMyBro VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,790
    Likes Received:
    4,976
    Dawgs mockery watchers overinflated numbers again :(
     
  9. chapped

    chapped Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    55,631
    Likes Received:
    61,912
    that is fucking sad ratings... a fucking test pattern could beat that shit
     
  10. Roland Schwinn

    Roland Schwinn *Likes reported as of October 14, 2016

    Reputations:
    195
    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,292
    Likes Received:
    3,524
    THAT is the kind of in depth analysis i like when it comes to this ratings shit! :tiptop:
     
  11. CCMaguire

    CCMaguire Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    8,869
    Sadly, she brought me to the table. I tune in for Beth, but not for the reasons she would like it to be. She's just too damn easy to mock.
     
  12. skylarbrie

    skylarbrie VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    10,598
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    10,794
    Likes Received:
    7,409
    t.v.bythenumbers.com
     
  13. killallposers

    killallposers VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    2,288
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    14,240
    Likes Received:
    23,038
    6th and 10th place on nat geo wild doesn't sound very impressive. most of the viewers stayed for the 2nd episode, though. maybe her show was bookended by a couple of the channel's top shows.
     
  14. NotMyBro

    NotMyBro VIP Extreme Gold

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,790
    Likes Received:
    4,976
    Except it's on NatGeoWild where that shit rating can be considered as a hit. :(
     
  15. fletchman71

    fletchman71 Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    -75
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    10,672
    Likes Received:
    1,991
    Those numbers make Gary and Hein's show ratings look even more embarassing. I imagine there is going to be a sharp drop off in week 2.
     
  16. Mlaw

    Mlaw Quite Contrarian VIP Gold

    Reputations:
    84,788
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Messages:
    61,843
    Likes Received:
    27,215
    that's more than respectable for a remote cable channel, and she held onto viewers for the second episode :cheer:
     
  17. zerokarma

    zerokarma Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    39
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,770
    Ratings will likely drop off on the following shows, no way they will maintain that.
     
  18. BrerJimmy

    BrerJimmy Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    4,474
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    8,432
    Likes Received:
    10,889
    That's probably quite good for the network. I don't know how many homes actually get that network, but I'm sure it's relatively few. And for the ones that do, I'd assume that the channel is hidden somewhere in 200-700 range. You're unlikely to stumble across it unless you're looking specifically for it.

    I mean, you still have to factor in production and promotion costs, as well as how well it does with respect to other programming. (Does Nat Geo Wild rely on a lot of original programming or are they content with second run shows of the parent network?) The test will be to see if it has legs. It doesn't have to be Game of Thrones, but they'd probably like to contend with that midget that runs the pit bull rescue.
     
  19. Dwainw

    Dwainw Active Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    196
    boobies!
     
  20. schnauzer

    schnauzer Well-Known Member

    Reputations:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    471
    Howard bought her viewers & Twitter followers on a 2 for 1 special