Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by chapped, Jun 4, 2014.
Didn't the thief realize the biker had a camera on his helmet?
It's ironic this thread appears on the front page 2 spots away from this thread:
Think this happened in South Africa
Was about to say the same thing.
It's not true. Hence why I said it's silly.
probably going to trade the bike for a bullet
While watching the video my mind was pointing out opportunities to draw and fire.
I don't click links, and I don't care what the pres. or any politician says, I don't waste my time to listen.
I don't know why I have to type this to you, but...... amnesty or not has nothing to do with them coming across the border. If the border was sealed, which is should be, then no one can come across. If it's not sealed, then people can and will come across. Coming or not coming is not based on amnesty.
If you truly cared about this issue, which you don't, you would have supported the pres. on this issue. But you need to be PC and pretend to oppose him on everything no matter what, even if it goes against your supposed principles.
i have lived in Cape Point, S.A. its a great place, but the criminals don't fuck around..
all the nice houses have razor wire and CC security
You are uninformed for listening. What they say means NOTHING. Therefore I don't care what they say, I only care what policies they enact.
WHy didn't you address my points? I don't mind being insulted, but counter my points first.
ANd if you have no interest whatsover is an an honest discussion of an issue, why pretend you do. There's an old saying in tx, or maybe in ny... fool me once......... we don't get fooled again
Mexico seems to disagree with this. look into their stance on illegal immigrants in THEIR country.
I don't care what their stance is. People can disagree with physics if they want I guess
we should implement their policy then. all the "conservatives" will be happy and if it will have no effect like you claim, the "liberals" should be cool with it. problem solved.
It's not just my claim. It's a fact. If the border was 100% secure then no one could illegaly come across it. I don't get how anyone is trying to argue that with me.
It's also a fact that that millions have been coming here and allowed to stay here for many many decades, even though there was no amnesty.
It's also a fact that the "most liberal guy ever" has the border more than twice as secure(that's not good enough) than all the "conservatives" combined. He also has deported more than twice as many as all the "conservatives" combined. So why won't the "conservatives" applaud that to encourage more? <br>
This discussion is nonsense