Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by dawg, Jul 26, 2013.
Why are white people lynching Zimmerman? Because he's Latino?
meh.....dude lost me at the hip-hop bullshit...
That dude kind of weirds me out.
the second some David Duke looking fucker starts bringing hip-hop to me that just equals scared of black people
OK, I was with the guy....until he said that Trayvon was "Violent and highly sexualized." He wouldn't show the sexual text...you know, because it might be too much for viewers.
Come on, Dawg. That's bullshit manipulation. I agreed with the Zimmerman verdict. I think GZ is a douche bag, but I thought his use of lethal force was justified. But trying to turn Trayvon into a highly sexualized predator is sheer scumbaggery. This guy is a fucking joke.
Don't shoot the messenger.
"Mixed martial arts punches" and "lean" Lean doesn't make you aggressive, you just sit on your ass and listen to really bad Houston rap.
The fact that he's wasting that much time on the phone with Jabba the witness could indicate he's beyond highly sexualized. No normal guy would touch that.
Fair enough. I need to stop thinking that every posts reflects the posters opinion. My apologies.
I disagree with the verdict but that shit is over in my book.. interesting that a juror came out today that said " that while she feels that Zimmerman was guilty of murder" what he did was not not against the law"She said the jury was following Florida law and the evidence, she said, did not prove murder." She also said she feels that she owes the Martin family an apology
but hey maybe GZ will keep saving more people
You can in Florida
I think the Stand Your Ground Laws were born from good intentions. We don't live in a perfect world.
I think it's disgusting, vile and inhumane that some states will charge/convict people for defending their lives or the lives of their family members with lethal force. And that's exactly what inspired Castle Doctrine and "Stand Your Ground" laws.
There needs to be guidelines and amendments to these laws. There's room for change that'd protect those who legitimately act in self-defense and those who are doing nothing wrong. It's one of the few times that a political compromise will benefit all. But as the law is written, I think GZ was not guilty.
I would have done the same given the "whoop ass" being given.
Punk got what he deserved. What kind of tea?
31 seconds into this:
"I said: boy, don't you go down there fucking with them Jews without no money..."
Please be more of a moron. Trayvon assaulted a school teacher and a public city bus driver. He was involved in MMA fighting and would attack kids at school and even total strangers. He also owned an illegal handgun and broke into houses to rob them of jewelry (which he was caught with). So that clearly establishes a pattern of violence.
As for the sex there was so much evidence on his phone and computer it was insane. Text messages and emails about girls and sex. Lots of porno videos and images of women. He was highly sexualized. Now...is this a crime? No. Is being sexual something negative. Not at all. Then why is it relevant? Because the media and Trayvon's parents lied and said he was some innocent kid who was just a child.
No innocent sweet little child has that much porno. There's nothing wrong with a teenager whacking it to porno. But it's a total lie to say he's some little kid who was a naive young boy who didn't do anything besides enjoy some skittles and basketball.
What you describe above is a great reason to root for a civil suit against GZ.
All that shit would be admissible.