What's worse?

Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by Beth143nacho, Jul 24, 2013.

?

Which is worse?

  1. Replays

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Live

    7 vote(s)
    58.3%
  3. I can't decide

    5 vote(s)
    41.7%
  1. Beth143nacho

    Beth143nacho Well-Known Member VIP

    Reputations:
    64,648
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    19,869
    Likes Received:
    16,650
    What is worse?

    a. A replay of shows from a time that Howard cared, put effort into and was relatable, even though they're whitewashed for content, completely contradict everything Howard currently "stands for" and are from before he was exposed to have been a selfish company man all along?

    or

    b. A live show with zero effort put into being interesting or interested or anything other than squeezing every red cent out of the company, show sponsors and listeners or promoting the careers of his wife or his other failed projects (agt, robins book, etc)?
     
  2. Judy Garland

    Judy Garland New Member Banned User

    Reputations:
    9
    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    5
    c. Anything Stern-related, including complaints about his non-show.
     
  3. F Vick

    F Vick Stuck up cunt Banned User

    Reputations:
    -126,447
    Joined:
    May 7, 2013
    Messages:
    7,199
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Live is worse...cause I still listen hoping to hear something funny.
    Replays I can turn off, cause I already know they suck balls
     
  4. Toronto Tom

    Toronto Tom Active Member

    Reputations:
    597
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    99
    All of the above.