Discussion in 'The Howard Stern Show' started by slats7, Oct 29, 2012.
Howard and Beth or Paul McCartney and his younger wife?
Compared to this???
props to both Howard and Paul. Rock on!
Paul's wife is an earner.
Paul still has his hair.
Howard looks like a "rock star"
Sir Paul's punch is sexier.........
Sorry, BOTH look regoddamdiculous.... Like daddies out with their daughters.
But for a winner: I think Howard and Beth look just awful - esp that pic. She looks like the quintessential gold-digging whore. No class, no taste, just out to get as much as she can get.
And, he looks like an IDIOT.
Paul's face is getting that lower jaw Pez dispenser look
All I see in that first picture is an old woman and her daughter?
Does this one have both legs?
I used to think Linda was British because she was ugly an had no talent.
Then he tried with a one legged Brit, who was a bitch.
Now he's with a Jersey Jewess, good luck, at least she looks like she's in her 40's it's not like a 20 year old. She's around 51 or so, it's about the same age difference.
That seriously looks like a pimp and his hooker.
McCartney just looks his age.
Howard looks flat out odd.
paul looks like trump's mom
howard looks like the biggest fucking tool dork.
they are both so bad, it doesn't matter which is worse. though i give the edge to howard, simply because of the amount of thought that went into his look. he was going for hip & cool, which is pathetic enough. but then this is what he comes up with. and beth. didn't it turn out that's a bathing suit (or was it lingerie?) she put shorts over? a couple of real fashionistas.
Hold on, we have a late entry. Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood and his soon-to-be 34-yo wife.
Is there nothing these women wont do for money?
I vote for Howie / Beth only because Paul has talent and seems to be a nice guy, or to be blunt, the opposite of Howard.